| Title | Constructing domestic retrofit as a new urban infrastructure: experimentation, equitability and contested priorities |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 63684 |
| Authors | Ince, R; Marvin, S |
| Title | Constructing domestic retrofit as a new urban infrastructure: experimentation, equitability and contested priorities |
| Year | 2019 |
| Published | Local Environment, 24, 9 |
| Abstract | British cities and residential suburbs were originally developed under a modernist growth logic: separating home from work, with little concern for energy use. But recent political and social priorities such as climate change and energy security have created an imperative to reduce domestic energy use, with many existing dwellings rendered "obsolete" on account of their poor energy efficiency. This precipitated a need to develop domestic retrofit - the modification of building fabrics and systems to improve their energy efficiency - as an urban infrastructure. The UK Government responded in 2011 with policies such as the "Green Deal", through which coalitions of actors in cities including local authorities, voluntary sector organisations and private businesses were encouraged to experiment with place-based retrofit. This paper examines the challenges and effects of developing a domestic retrofit infrastructure in a North London borough under particularly challenging policy conditions. We develop a hybrid framework for understanding the process and product of this place-based experimentation and through this we ask two questions: 1. How did both local and national conditions enable and limit the development of this infrastructure? 2. Was the emerging urban infrastructure functional and equitable? In Haringey's case, a strong local political agenda positioned retrofit as a development opportunity and vehicle for reducing inequality, but national priorities around market-making and technological fixes dominated emerging responses. Whilst Haringey's efforts in a difficult policy context did result in retrofits and improvements to around a thousand properties, the emerging infrastructure of retrofit services was incomplete, inequitable and temporary. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
65115
|
De Laurentis, C; Eames, M; Hunt, M Retrofitting the built environment 'to save' energy: Arbed, the emergence of a distinctive sustainability transition pathway in Wales(2017)Environment And Planning C-Politics And Space, 35.0, 7 | |
| 63908
|
Brown, P; Swan, W; Chahal, S Retrofitting social housing: reflections by tenants on adopting and living with retrofit technology(2014)Energy Efficiency, 7, 4 | |
| 63563
|
Dixon, T Commercial property retrofitting What does "retrofit" mean, and how can we scale up action in the UK sector?(2014)Journal Of Property Investment & Finance, 32, 4 | |
| 62865
|
Howarth, C; Roberts, BM The Role of the UK Green Deal in Shaping Pro-Environmental Behaviours: Insights from Two Case Studies(2018)Sustainability, 10, 6 | |
| 64196
|
Bergman, N; Foxon, TJ Reframing policy for the energy efficiency challenge: Insights from housing retrofits in the United Kingdom(2020) | |
| 63074
|
Gooding, L; Gul, MS Energy efficiency retrofitting services supply chains: A review of evolving demands from housing policy(2016) | |
| 74008
|
Mangialardo, A; Micelli, E Off-site Retrofit to Regenerate Multi-family Homes: Evidence from Some European Experiences(2019) | |
| 62856
|
Dowson, M; Poole, A; Harrison, D; Susman, G Domestic UK retrofit challenge: Barriers, incentives and current performance leading into the Green Deal(2012) | |
| 64605
|
Swan, W; Ruddock, L; Smith, L Low carbon retrofit: attitudes and readiness within the social housing sector(2013)Engineering Construction And Architectural Management, 20, 5 | |
| 65105
|
Swan, W; Fitton, R; Smith, L; Abbott, C; Smith, L Adoption of sustainable retrofit in UK social housing 2010-2015(2017)International Journal Of Building Pathology And Adaptation, 35.0, 5 |