| Title | Potentials and Limitations of Subsidies in Sustainability Governance: The Example of Agriculture |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 63732 |
| Authors | Heyl, K; Ekardt, F; Sund, L; Roos, P |
| Title | Potentials and Limitations of Subsidies in Sustainability Governance: The Example of Agriculture |
| Year | 2022 |
| Published | Sustainability, 14, 23 |
| Abstract | The goals of the Paris Agreement and the Convention on Biological Diversity call for a global transition to sustainability. To achieve these goals, subsidies can be implemented. Subsidies are pervasive especially (but not only) in the agricultural sector. The agricultural sector plays an important role in the transition to sustainability as agriculture can both benefit and harm climate and biodiversity. Some agricultural subsidies seem environmentally beneficial, but the majority appear environmentally destructive. Against this background, this article applies a qualitative governance analysis-including aspects of legal analysis-to provide a comprehensive review of agricultural subsidies in the EU and to discuss the role of subsidies in transitioning towards sustainability. Results show that agricultural subsidies need to be substantially downscaled and implemented as complementary instruments only because other policy instruments such as quantity control instruments are more effective in addressing the drivers of non-sustainability, i.e., fossil fuels and livestock farming. However, subsidies remain a useful complementary instrument to remunerate the provision of public goods (e.g., in nature conservation) as long as they are constructed in a way that they do not suffer from typical governance problems. In addition, data and transparency need to be improved, subsidies for research and development increased, and environmental objectives streamlined through EU law to ensure all agricultural subsidies are in line with global environmental goals. |
| https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15859/pdf?version=1669875243 |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
63103
|
Cuadros-Casanova, I; Cristiano, A; Biancolini, D; Cimatti, M; Sessa, AA; Angarita, VYM; Dragonetti, C; Pacifici, M; Rondinini, C; Di Marco, M Opportunities and challenges for Common Agricultural Policy reform to support the European Green Deal(2023)Conservation Biology, 37, 3 | |
| 7617
|
Doukas, YE; Salvati, L; Vardopoulos, I Unraveling the European Agricultural Policy Sustainable Development Trajectory(2023)Land, 12, 9 | |
| 63406
|
Pe'er, G; Bonn, A; Bruelheide, H; Dieker, P; Eisenhauer, N; Feindt, PH; Hagedorn, G; Hansjürgens, B; Herzon, I; Lomba, A; Marquard, E; Moreira, F; Nitsch, H; Oppermann, R; Perino, A; Röder, N; Schleyer, C; Schindler, S; Wolf, C; Zinngrebe, Y; Lakner, S Action needed for the EU Common Agricultural Policy to address sustainability challenges(2020)People And Nature, 2, 2 | |
| 62998
|
Boix-Fayos, C; de Vente, J Challenges and potential pathways towards sustainable agriculture within the European Green Deal(2023) |