Knowledge Agora



Similar Articles

Title Management practices for compostable plastic packaging waste: Impacts, challenges and recommendations
ID_Doc 64724
Authors Cristóbal, J; Albizzati, PF; Giavini, M; Caro, D; Manfredi, S; Tonini, D
Title Management practices for compostable plastic packaging waste: Impacts, challenges and recommendations
Year 2023
Published
Abstract The EU Green Deal aims at solving the challenges related to plastic production, (mis-)use, and pollution. While the bioplastic industry is identified as one of the possible avenues to tackle the problem, bioplastic waste collection and management practices are still far from full-development and harmonisation. To inform policy makers on the best practices and their feasibility, this study quantifies environmental and economic impacts of compostable plastic packaging (CPP) waste management schemes by means of Life Cycle Assessment and Costing. Results show that, with respect to climate change and financial costs, the scheme leading to the highest benefits is collecting CPP with conventional plastic waste followed by mechanical sorting and recycling (saving ca. 306 kg CO2eq. t-1 at a net income of 3.7 EUR t-1). The second best option is collecting CPP with bio-waste followed by biological treatment (saving ca. 69 kg CO2eq. t-1 at a cost of 197 EUR t-1). Collecting CPP with conventional plastics followed by sorting and biological treatment is to be avoided. The trend on the other impact categories generally follows climate change. Ideally, closed loop is therefore preferred, but conditioned by (i) having high share of CPP in municipal waste (else sorting is economically unfeasible), (ii) good citizen's behaviour at source-segregation, and (iii) an established market for secondary material. Currently, overall benefits are limited by the low amounts, suggesting that the management choice could ultimately be based on rather simple technical and economic feasibility criteria while regulatory and management efforts should be focused on other waste streams with greater implications on environment.
PDF https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2023.08.010

Similar Articles

ID Score Article
6044 Baran, B Plastic waste as a challenge for sustainable development and circularity in the European Union(2020)Ekonomia I Prawo-Economics And Law, 19, 1
16812 Tallentire, CW; Steubing, B The environmental benefits of improving packaging waste collection in Europe(2020)
12587 Milios, L; Davani, AE; Yu, Y Sustainability Impact Assessment of Increased Plastic Recycling and Future Pathways of Plastic Waste Management in Sweden(2018)Recycling, 3.0, 3
21237 Baran, B Resource (in)efficiency in the EU: a case of plastic waste(2022)Ekonomia I Prawo-Economics And Law, 21.0, 1
27077 Volk, R; Stallkamp, C; Steins, JJ; Yogish, SP; Muller, RC; Stapf, D; Schultmann, F Techno-economic assessment and comparison of different plastic recycling pathways: A German case study(2021)Journal Of Industrial Ecology, 25.0, 5
3734 Meys, R; Frick, F; Westhues, S; Sternberg, A; Klankermayer, J; Bardow, A Towards a circular economy for plastic packaging wastes - the environmental potential of chemical recycling(2020)
10952 Budisa, M; Sirocic, AP Plastic Waste Management(2022)Kemija U Industriji-Journal Of Chemists And Chemical Engineers, 71, 9-10
28934 Van Eygen, E; Laner, D; Fellner, J Circular economy of plastic packaging: Current practice and perspectives in Austria(2018)
8344 Ncube, LK; Ude, AU; Ogunmuyiwa, EN; Zulkifli, R; Beas, IN An Overview of Plastic Waste Generation and Management in Food Packaging Industries(2021)Recycling, 6.0, 1
18008 Van Fan, Y; Cucek, L; Krajnc, D; Klemes, JJ; Lee, CT Life cycle assessment of plastic packaging recycling embedded with responsibility distribution as driver for environmental mitigation(2023)
Scroll