Knowledge Agora



Similar Articles

Title The R&D cost of climate mitigation in agriculture
ID_Doc 64793
Authors Fuglie, K; Ray, S; Baldos, ULC; Hertel, TW
Title The R&D cost of climate mitigation in agriculture
Year 2022
Published Applied Economic Perspectives And Policy, 44, 4
Abstract Agriculture is responsible for 20%-25% of global emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG), which result from production practices and land use conversion. Supply-side approaches for reducing emissions from agriculture rely on emissions-saving technological change and environmental protection of carbon-rich areas. This study investigates how productivity policies, in the form of higher agricultural research and development (R&D) spending, might affect GHG emissions from agriculture, and compares this to environmental policies that restrict agricultural land use or production practices that may cause environmental harm. Using simulations from a global economic model, we project outcomes in 2050 from a set of policy scenarios involving R&D and environmental policies, and combinations of the two. Outcomes of interest are net global GHG emissions, land use, agricultural production, food prices, the prevalence of food insecurity, and policy cost. We find that at the global level, more R&D spending to accelerate productivity growth reduces GHG emissions from land use change, but not as effectively as targeted environmental policies. However, accelerated productivity growth reduces the emissions intensity of agricultural production and, by lowering land rents, also reduces the cost of the environmental policy. Moreover, higher levels of productivity lower agricultural GHG emissions permanently, and by lowering global food prices, generally improve global food security. A policy scenario that is patterned after the EU Green Deal finds that policies that restrict agricultural factor inputs in order to reduce local environmental costs may, at the global level, increase agricultural GHG emissions and worsen food insecurity. These consequences could be avoided with higher EU R&D spending to accelerate agricultural productivity growth that is either factor neutral or biased toward saving production factors associated with negative environmental externalities.
PDF

Similar Articles

ID Score Article
65022 Haddad, S; Escobar, N; Bruckner, M; Britz, W Subsidizing extensive cattle production in the European Union has major implications for global agricultural trade and climate change(2024)
64924 Clora, F; Yu, WS; Baudry, G; Costa, L Impacts of supply-side climate change mitigation practices and trade policy regimes under dietary transition: the case of European agriculture(2021)Environmental Research Letters, 16.0, 12
63745 Sands, RD; Suttles, SA World agricultural baseline scenarios through 2050(2022)Applied Economic Perspectives And Policy, 44, 4
69057 Choi, HS; Grethe, H; Entenmann, SK; Wiesmeth, M; Blesl, M; Wagner, M Potential trade-offs of employing perennial biomass crops for the bioeconomy in the EU by 2050: Impacts on agricultural markets in the EU and the world(2019)Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 11, 3
63797 Wang, SL; Rada, N; Williams, R; Newton, D Accounting for climatic effects in measuring US field crop farm productivity(2022)Applied Economic Perspectives And Policy, 44, 4
63072 Guyomard, H; Soler, LG; Détang-Dessendre, C; Réquillart, V The European Green Deal improves the sustainability of food systems but has uneven economic impacts on consumers and farmers(2023)Communications Earth & Environment, 4, 1
63103 Cuadros-Casanova, I; Cristiano, A; Biancolini, D; Cimatti, M; Sessa, AA; Angarita, VYM; Dragonetti, C; Pacifici, M; Rondinini, C; Di Marco, M Opportunities and challenges for Common Agricultural Policy reform to support the European Green Deal(2023)Conservation Biology, 37, 3
65048 Guillaume, A; Appels, L; Latka, C; Kocí, V; Geeraerd, A Mitigating environmental impacts of food consumption in the European Union: Is the power truly on our plates?(2024)
Scroll