| Abstract |
The EU ratification of the Paris Agreement initiated extensive political and legislative activities within the EU to reach agreed climate objectives. The declaration of the climate crisis, the publication of the European Green Deal, and the obligation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by at least 55% by 2030 compared to 1990 levels created the foundations for establishing an ambitious climate legal framework at the EU level. At the center of that legal framework is the European Climate Law, which obliges the EU to achieve climate neutrality by 2050. Completing the set goals requires a strong climate transition, which includes, among other actions, a change to a low-carbon economy. At the EU level, the obligation to fulfill the goals of the Paris Agreement and the related goals of the European Climate Law is primarily on the institutions of executive and legislative power that have the democratic legitimacy to act actively to achieve climate neutrality. However, the international agreements concluded by the EU (including the Paris Agreement) are binding upon all EU institutions, i.e., the European Central Bank, as explicitly prescribed in the TFEU. The European Central Bank, simply put, represents the supranational central bank of the eurozone. With regard to its legal nature, the European Central Bank is often defined as an EU institution sui generis, which reflects its unique position given by the TFEU and the Statute of the ESCB and the ECB. Apart from the fact that the European Central Bank has a legal personality and regulatory powers and that its financial resources are separated from those of the EU, the ECB's unique position derives from the fact that the TFEU strictly limits its legal mandate. The primary mandate of the European Central Bank is to maintain price stability within the eurozone. The secondary mandate of the European Central Bank is to support, without prejudice to its price stability objective, the general economic policies in the EU, with a view to contributing to the achievement of the objectives of the EU, including a high level of protection and improvement of the quality of the environment. Considering its strictly prescribed goals, addressing the climate objectives could contradict the European Central Bank's legal mandate. Even though the European Central Bank has already decided to take into consideration climate-related objectives, there is still an ongoing debate in academic and central banks' circles whether the European Central Bank could or must address climate objectives in its activities or, following the rule of law principle, is precluded in doing so. This paper aims to contribute to this debate by giving the legal perspective of the European Central Bank's price stability mandate and its secondary mandate, as well as their relation to EU climate objectives. |
