| Title | Remanufacturing supply chain: an analysis of performance indicator areas |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 68003 |
| Authors | Ansari, ZN; Kant, R; Shankar, R |
| Title | Remanufacturing supply chain: an analysis of performance indicator areas |
| Year | 2022 |
| Published | International Journal Of Productivity And Performance Management, 71, 1 |
| Abstract | Purpose Re-use of products in the supply chain has become a significant consideration in the last decade. It has resulted in the development of several product recovery alternatives. Remanufacturing in the supply chain is one such product recovery option that yields social, economic and environmental benefits. This study aims is to identify and evaluate the key performance indicators (KPIs) of the remanufacturing supply chain (RSC). Design/methodology/approach The KPIs of RSC are classified along with the five primary management processes (plan, source, make, deliver and return) of the supply chain operations reference (SCOR) model. A grey decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) technique is applied to investigate the complex interrelationships amongst the identified KPIs and categorize them into cause and effect group. The applicability of the proposed framework is demonstrated through a case organization involved in remanufacturing business. Findings The KPIs are identified based on literature analysis and subsequent discussion with decision panel experts. The present research work results reveal that "consumer awareness program", "technological compatibility" and skilled workforce' are the most influential indicators. Originality/value This research work provides a framework to evaluate the causal relationship between the RSC KPIs. The framework proposed in this study is empirically applied to a case organization. Based on the study findings some important recommendations are presented to the decision-makers/policy planners to help them develop an action plan. This would help the case organization reduce resource consumption, increase market share and enable sustainable development. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
27499
|
Ferraro, S; Baffa, F; Cantini, A; Leoni, L; De Carlo, F; Campatelli, G Exploring remanufacturing conveniency: An economic and energetic assessment for a closed-loop supply chain of a mechanical component(2024) | |
| 19710
|
Hofmeester, R; Eyers, DR Strategic opportunities for product-agnostic remanufacturing(2023)International Journal Of Logistics Management, 34.0, 6 | |
| 16135
|
Ferraro, S; Cantini, A; Leoni, L; De Carlo, F Science Mapping Analysis for the Development of a Remanufacturing Readiness Model(2024) | |
| 74309
|
Goodall, P; Rosamond, E; Harding, J A review of the state of the art in tools and techniques used to evaluate remanufacturing feasibility(2014) | |
| 20947
|
Arredondo-Soto, KC; Jiménez-Zaragoza, A; Miranda-Ackerman, MA; Blanco-Fernández, J; García-Lechuga, A; Hernández-Escobedo, G; García-Alcaraz, JL Design and Repair Strategies Based on Product-Service System and Remanufacturing for Value Preservation(2022)Sustainability, 14, 14 | |
| 19471
|
Azevedo, SG; Pimentel, CMO; Alves, AC; Matias, JCO Support of Advanced Technologies in Supply Chain Processes and Sustainability Impact(2021)Applied Sciences-Basel, 11.0, 7 | |
| 66898
|
Kottala, SY; Herbert, K An empirical investigation of supply chain operations reference model practices and supply chain performance Evidence from manufacturing sector(2020)International Journal Of Productivity And Performance Management, 69, 9 | |
| 21067
|
Diener, DL; Kushnir, D; Tillman, AM Scrap happens: A case of industrial end-users, component remanufacturing outcome(2019) | |
| 20532
|
Fofou, RF; Jiang, ZG; Wang, Y A Review on the Lifecycle Strategies Enhancing Remanufacturing(2021)Applied Sciences-Basel, 11, 13 | |
| 78074
|
Bai, CG; Sarkis, J; Wei, XP; Koh, L Evaluating ecological sustainable performance measures for supply chain management(2012)Supply Chain Management-An International Journal, 17, 1 |