| Title | Study on Low-Carbon Technology Innovation Strategies through Government-University-Enterprise Cooperation under Carbon Trading Policy |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 68377 |
| Authors | Wang, JW; Song, YH; Li, M; Yuan, C; Guo, F |
| Title | Study on Low-Carbon Technology Innovation Strategies through Government-University-Enterprise Cooperation under Carbon Trading Policy |
| Year | 2022 |
| Published | Sustainability, 14, 15 |
| Abstract | This paper focuses on developing low-carbon technology (LCT) innovation in traditional enterprises under carbon trading policies. The Hamilton-Jacobi-Berman equation quantitatively investigates the coordination mechanism and optimal strategy of LCT innovation systems in conventional industries. A three-way dynamic differential game model is constructed to analyze three cases: the Nash disequilibrium game; the Stackelberg master-slave game; and the cooperative game with the optimal effort of universities, traditional enterprises, and local government, the optimal benefits of the three parties, the region, and the regional LCT level. The results are as follows: (1) by changing the government subsidy factor, carbon trading price, and carbon trading tax rate, the optimal effort of universities and traditional enterprises can be significantly increased; (2) cost-sharing contracts do not change the level of effort of local government to manage the environment, and the use of cost-sharing agreements can change the status of action of universities and enterprises; (3) the optimal effort, optimal benefit, and total system benefit of the three parties and the level of LCT of the industry in the cooperative game are better than those in the non-cooperative case. The combined game achieves the Pareto optimum of the system. The study will contribute to both sustainable business development and environmental sustainability. |
| https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9381/pdf?version=1659599695 |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
30844
|
Deng, YL; You, DM; Zhang, Y Research on improvement strategies for low-carbon technology innovation based on a differential game: The perspective of tax competition(2021) | |
| 75283
|
Lu, CJ; Yang, CT; Yen, HF Stackelberg game approach for sustainable production-inventory model with collaborative investment in technology for reducing carbon emissions(2020) | |
| 30281
|
Cui, BQ; Shui, ZH; Yang, S; Lei, TY Evolutionary game analysis of green technology innovation under the carbon emission trading mechanism(2022) | |
| 35366
|
Yu, X; Xu, YD; Zhang, J; Sun, Y The Synergy Green Innovation Effect of Green Innovation Subsidies and Carbon Taxes(2022)Sustainability, 14, 6 | |
| 35414
|
Yu, X; Xu, YD; Sun, M; Zhang, YZ The Green-Innovation-Inducing Effect of a Unit Progressive Carbon Tax(2021)Sustainability, 13, 21 | |
| 35153
|
Gao, K; Guo, X; Liu, TT; Han, R Government Low-Carbon Policies Optimization for Smart Transportation Enterprises(2022) | |
| 31220
|
Zhao, X; Bai, Y; Ding, LL; Wang, L Tripartite Evolutionary Game Theory Approach for Low-Carbon Power Grid Technology Cooperation With Government Intervention(2020) | |
| 35234
|
Chen, L; Bai, X; Chen, B; Wang, JJ Incentives for Green and Low-Carbon Technological Innovation of Enterprises Under Environmental Regulation: From the Perspective of Evolutionary Game(2022) | |
| 30634
|
Wang, FQ; Li, HM; Cao, YC; Zhang, CY; Ran, YL Knowledge Sharing Strategy and Emission Reduction Benefits of Low Carbon Technology Collaborative Innovation in the Green Supply Chain(2022) | |
| 31802
|
Huo, H; Lu, YW; Wang, Y Evolutionary game analysis of low-carbon transformation and technological innovation in the cold chain under dual government intervention(2024) |