| Title | CSR Actions, Brand Value, and Willingness to Pay a Premium Price for Luxury Brands: Does Long-Term Orientation Matter? |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 68617 |
| Authors | Diallo, MF; Mouelhi, NB; Gadekar, M; Schill, M |
| Title | CSR Actions, Brand Value, and Willingness to Pay a Premium Price for Luxury Brands: Does Long-Term Orientation Matter? |
| Year | 2021 |
| Published | Journal Of Business Ethics, 169, 2 |
| Abstract | Sustainable luxury is a strategic issue for managers and for society, yet it remains poorly understood. This research seeks to clarify how corporate social responsibility (CSR) actions directly and indirectly (through brand value dimensions) affect consumers' willingness to pay a premium price (WTPP) for luxury brand products, as well as how a long-term orientation (LTO) might moderate these relationships. A scenario study presents fictional CSR actions of two brands, representing different luxury products, to 1,049 respondents from two countries (France and Tunisia). The results of a structural equation modeling approach show that the luxury brands' CSR actions negatively affect customer WTPP overall and for each brand. The luxury brands' functional and symbolic value dimensions positively mediate the effects of CSR actions on WTPP, whereas social value does not. The effects of CSR actions and brand symbolic value on WTTP do not differ between countries. The effect of functional value on WTPP differs across countries, such that it is stronger for high-LTO than low-LTO cultures. Inversely, the effect of social on customer WTPP is stronger for low-LTO than high-LTO cultures. These findings have theoretical and practical implications for luxury brand managers. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
77031
|
Narayanan, S; Singh, GA Consumers' willingness to pay for corporate social responsibility: Theory and evidence(2023)International Journal Of Consumer Studies, 47, 6 | |
| 66506
|
Goedertier, F; Weijters, B; van den Bergh, J Are Consumers Equally Willing to Pay More for Brands That Aim for Sustainability, Positive Societal Contribution, and Inclusivity as for Brands That Are Perceived as Exclusive? Generational, Gender, and Country Differences(2024)Sustainability, 16, 9 | |
| 74672
|
Dinh, TM; Le Hoang, QC; Hoang, HDV; Lao, TKL; Pham, THT Do luxury brands have to trade off for sustainability?(2024) | |
| 73030
|
Broccardo, L; Culasso, F; Dhir, A; Truant, E Corporate social responsibility: Does it really matter in the luxury context?(2023)Corporate Social Responsibility And Environmental Management, 30, 1 | |
| 68165
|
Thomas, G Corporate Social Responsibility as a Sustainable Business Practice: A Study among Generation Z Customers of Indian Luxury Hotels(2022)Sustainability, 14, 24 | |
| 71665
|
Ramesh, K; Saha, R; Goswami, S; Sekar,; Dahiya, R Consumer's response to CSR activities: Mediating role of brand image and brand attitude(2019)Corporate Social Responsibility And Environmental Management, 26.0, 2 | |
| 67889
|
Chan, TJ; Suki, NM; Ho, PSY; Akhtar, MF Impact of corporate social responsibility practices on consumer purchase intention of apparel products with mediating role of consumer-retailer love(2024)Social Responsibility Journal, 20, 5 | |
| 68460
|
Mosca, F; Civera, C; Casalegno, C The Communication of Sustainability by Italian Fashion Luxury Brands: A Framework to Qualitatively Evaluate Innovation and Integration(2018) |