| Title | The examination of power and politics in a conservation organisation |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 68974 |
| Authors | Powell, L; Tilt, C |
| Title | The examination of power and politics in a conservation organisation |
| Year | 2017 |
| Published | Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30, 3 |
| Abstract | Purpose - For more than three decades, researchers have been searching for evidence of corporate economic, social and environmental sustainability, the holy grail of corporate success in a socially and environmentally conscious world of the future. The vast majority of entities that researchers have investigated have focussed on the primary goal of profit maximisation, with only vaguely articulated (if any) social and environmental targets. Very little research has been undertaken to expose the inner workings of organisations that are striving primarily to improve environmental outcomes within a commercial setting. The purpose of this paper is to expose the inside details of an organisation that tried but failed, and highlights the role of power and politics in its demise. Design/methodology/approach - The "processual" or "contextualist" (Burns, 2000, p. 568) methodology adopted in this investigation has facilitated the interpretation and understanding of complex inter-relationships existing amongst key management personnel. The method steps undertaken included observation and documentation of organisational strategic and operational decision-making practices over a period of 22 months and the examination and analysis of over 800 documents prepared either by or about the organisation. Findings - Examining the inter-relationships of power and politics amongst key players during a period of significant change revealed an intense struggle for corporate survival between two management groups: the original "environmentalist" managers who prepared the entity for listing on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX); and, the introduced "economic rationalist" managers who guided it through the post listing phase. A failure to effectively transition the power held over resources, decision-making and meanings from the old to the new managers proved to significantly challenge the organisation and possibly contributed to its ultimate demise. Some important lessons were highlighted, particularly the need to develop and establish shared understandings. It is suggested that for a business to move closer to being sustainable, rather than allowing one of the existing paradigms to dominate, a new business model needs to emerge. Originality/value - The practical implementation of conservation activities on a large commercial scale is a controversial notion. The investigation of this unique case through a period of significant change represents an important experiment in the quest for sustainability and reveals valuable lessons that may guide other organisations that follow in its wake. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
34440
|
Springett, D Structural limits to sustainable development: managers and progressive agency(2005)International Journal Of Innovation And Sustainable Development, 1, 1-2 | |
| 74188
|
Cartwright, W; Craig, JL Sustainability: aligning corporate governance, strategy and operations with the planet(2006)Business Process Management Journal, 12, 6 | |
| 71474
|
Farias, G; Landrum, NE; Farias, C; Krysa, I Explorations in organized hypocrisy and a proposed direction for a sustainable future(2023) | |
| 65758
|
Wasiluk, KL Beyond eco-efficiency: understanding CS through the IC practice lens(2013)Journal Of Intellectual Capital, 14.0, 1 | |
| 14412
|
Waddock, S Stewardship of the future Large system change and company stewardship(2015) | |
| 75486
|
Sarkar, R Public Policy and Corporate Environmental Behaviour: a Broader View(2008)Corporate Social Responsibility And Environmental Management, 15, 5 | |
| 34655
|
DesJardins, J Is it Time to Jump off the Sustainability Bandwagon?(2016)Business Ethics Quarterly, 26, 1 | |
| 65771
|
Venkatraman, S; Nayak, RR Relationships among triple bottom line elements Focus on integrating sustainable business practices(2015)Journal Of Global Responsibility, 6.0, 2 | |
| 66860
|
Abela, M A new direction? The mainstreaming" of sustainability reporting"(2022)Sustainability Accounting Management And Policy Journal, 13, 6 | |
| 68453
|
Mysen, T Sustainability as corporate mission and strategy(2012)European Business Review, 24, 6 |