Knowledge Agora



Similar Articles

Title Potential trade-offs of employing perennial biomass crops for the bioeconomy in the EU by 2050: Impacts on agricultural markets in the EU and the world
ID_Doc 69057
Authors Choi, HS; Grethe, H; Entenmann, SK; Wiesmeth, M; Blesl, M; Wagner, M
Title Potential trade-offs of employing perennial biomass crops for the bioeconomy in the EU by 2050: Impacts on agricultural markets in the EU and the world
Year 2019
Published Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 11, 3
Abstract Perennial biomass crops (PBC) are considered a crucial feedstock for sustainable biomass supply to the bioeconomy that compete less with food production compared to traditional crops. However, large-scale development of PBC as a means to reach greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation targets would require not only the production on land previously not used for agriculture, but also the use of land that is currently used for agricultural production. This study aims to evaluate agricultural market impacts with biomass demand for food, feed, and PBC in four bioeconomy scenarios ("Business as usual," "Improved relevance of bioeconomy," "Extensive transformation to a bioeconomy," "Extensive transformation to a bioeconomy with diet change") to achieve a 75% GHG reduction target in the emission trading sector of the EU until 2050. We simulated bioeconomy scenarios in the energy system model TIMES-PanEU and the agricultural sector model ESIM and conducted a sensitivity analysis considering crop yields, PBC yields, and land use options of PBC. Our results show that all bioeconomy scenarios except the one with diet change lead to increasing food prices (the average food price index increases by about 11% in the EU and 2.5%-3.0% in world markets). A combination of the transformation to a bioeconomy combined with diet change toward less animal protein in the EU is the only scenario that results in only moderately increasing food prices within the EU (+3.0%) and even falling global food prices (-6.4%). In addition, crop yield improvement and cultivation of PBC on marginal land help to reduce increases in food prices, but higher land prices are inevitable because those measures have only small effects on sparing agricultural land for PBC. For a transition to a bioeconomy that acknowledges climate mitigation targets, counter-measures for those substantial direct and indirect impacts on agricultural markets should be taken into account.
PDF https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/gcbb.12596

Similar Articles

ID Score Article
24660 Ignat, R; Chiripuci, BC; Patarlageanu, SR; Constantin, M; Lazar, V Tackling market opportunities for the biomass production in Romania(2022)Proceedings Of The International Conference On Business Excellence, 16, 1
9469 Philippidis, G; M'Barek, R; Urban-Boysen, K; Van Zeist, WJ Exploring economy-wide sustainable conditions for EU bio-chemical activities(2023)
64925 Faaij, APC Repairing What Policy Is Missing Out on: A Constructive View on Prospects and Preconditions for Sustainable Biobased Economy Options to Mitigate and Adapt to Climate Change(2022)Energies, 15.0, 16
71480 Simon, S; Wiegmann, K Modelling sustainable bioenergy potentials from agriculture for Germany and Eastern European countries(2009)Biomass & Bioenergy, 33.0, 4
65022 Haddad, S; Escobar, N; Bruckner, M; Britz, W Subsidizing extensive cattle production in the European Union has major implications for global agricultural trade and climate change(2024)
65048 Guillaume, A; Appels, L; Latka, C; Kocí, V; Geeraerd, A Mitigating environmental impacts of food consumption in the European Union: Is the power truly on our plates?(2024)
64924 Clora, F; Yu, WS; Baudry, G; Costa, L Impacts of supply-side climate change mitigation practices and trade policy regimes under dietary transition: the case of European agriculture(2021)Environmental Research Letters, 16.0, 12
8902 Clifton-Brown, J; Hastings, A; von Cossel, M; Murphy-Bokern, D; McCalmont, J; Whittaker, J; Alexopoulou, E; Amaducci, S; Andronic, L; Ashman, C; Awty-Carroll, D; Bhatia, R; Breuer, L; Cosentino, S; Cracroft-Eley, W; Donnison, I; Elbersen, B; Ferrarini, A; Ford, J; Greef, J; Ingram, J; Lewandowski, I; Magenau, E; Mos, M; Petrick, M; Pogrzeba, M; Robson, P; Rowe, RL; Sandu, A; Schwarz, KU; Scordia, D; Scurlock, J; Shepherd, A; Thornton, J; Trindade, LM; Vetter, S; Wagner, M; Wu, PC; Yamada, T; Kiesel, A Perennial biomass cropping and use: Shaping the policy ecosystem in European countries(2023)Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 15.0, 5
63539 Mayer, A; Kalt, G; Kaufmann, L; Röös, E; Muller, A; Weisshaidinger, R; Frehner, A; Roux, N; Smith, P; Theurl, MC; Matej, S; Erb, K Impacts of Scaling up Agroecology on the Sustainability of European Agriculture in 2050Die Auswirkungen einer grossflachigen Verbreitung von agrarokologischen Massnahmen auf die Nachhaltigkeit der europaischen Landwirtschaft im Jahr 2050(2022)Eurochoices, 21, 3
64793 Fuglie, K; Ray, S; Baldos, ULC; Hertel, TW The R&D cost of climate mitigation in agriculture(2022)Applied Economic Perspectives And Policy, 44, 4
Scroll