| Title | Methodology to assess the circularity in building construction and refurbishment activities |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 6911 |
| Authors | González, A; Sendra, C; Herena, A; Rosquillas, M; Vaz, D |
| Title | Methodology to assess the circularity in building construction and refurbishment activities |
| Year | 2021 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | This paper proposes a novel and innovative methodology to assess the degree of Circularity in one of the most resource-consuming and impactful economic activities: the building construction and/or renovation works. The proposed approach measures the ratio of circular flows in three aspects: energy, water and materials consumption; and combines them with the measure of social added value and economic value of the entire activity along its life cycle, regardless of being a new building construction or a major renovation work. The whole methodology has been developed under a life cycle perspective, incorporating into the analysis all material flows and social, environmental and economic impacts from cradle to grave, i.e., from resource acquisition to end of life treatment processes or disposal. The proposed Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) measure different and nondirectly related parameters (energy, materials, social impact...) and they are both quantitative and qualitative metrics. Hence, the proposed methodology performs the indicators calculation procedure independently. The methodology has been tested with a conventional energy renovation process consisting of an installation of an External Thermal Insulation Composite System (ETICS) - one of the most prevailing facade energy retrofitting alternatives - combined with a rooftop solar PV system. In this way, a calculation example is shown and some lessons can be extracted regarding the degree circularity of current building construction and refurbishment practices. Results show that current building envelope solutions - even including an efficient rooftop PV system - are far from being considered circular: whereas a significant 51% of Energy Circularity is achieved, only a 29% and a 21% degree of Circularity is observed for the materials and social aspects, also with high payback periods - above 20 years - on the economic side. The methodology also succeeds in showing the potential for improvement and its location along the building life cycle. It is also shown that buildings behave significantly different in each of the addressed CE aspects: materials, energy and water use, social added value and life cycle cost; showing also different potential of improvement. |
| https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcradv.2021.200051 |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
4646
|
Khadim, N; Agliata, R; Thaheem, MJ; Mollo, L Whole building circularity indicator: A circular economy assessment framework for promoting circularity and sustainability in buildings and construction(2023) | |
| 3409
|
Mercader-Moyano, P; Anaya-Duran, P; Romero-Cortes, A Eco-Efficient Ventilated Facades Based on Circular Economy for Residential Buildings as an Improvement of Energy Conditions(2021)Energies, 14, 21 | |
| 21395
|
Honarvar, SMH; Golabchi, M; Ledari, MB Building circularity as a measure of sustainability in the old and modern architecture: A case study of architecture development in the hot and dry climate(2022) | |
| 28537
|
Eberhardt, L; Birgisdottir, H; Birkved, M Dynamic Benchmarking of Building Strategies for a Circular Economy(2019) | |
| 3872
|
Hossain, MU; Ng, ST Critical consideration of buildings' environmental impact assessment towards adoption of circular economy: An analytical review(2018) | |
| 5217
|
Kosanovic, S; Miletic, M; Markovic, L Energy Refurbishment of Family Houses in Serbia in Line with the Principles of Circular Economy(2021)Sustainability, 13, 10 | |
| 26138
|
Antonini, E; Boeri, A; Lauria, M; Giglio, F Reversibility and Durability as Potential Indicators for Circular Building Technologies(2020)Sustainability, 12, 18 | |
| 26912
|
Scolaro, AM; De Medici, S Downcycling and Upcycling in Rehabilitation and Adaptive Reuse of Pre-Existing Buildings: Re-Designing Technological Performances in an Environmental Perspective(2021)Energies, 14, 21 | |
| 4915
|
Rahla, KM; Mateus, R; Bragança, L Selection Criteria for Building Materials and Components in Line with the Circular Economy Principles in the Built Environment-A Review of Current Trends(2021)Infrastructures, 6, 4 | |
| 20852
|
Mercader-Moyano, P; Esquivias, PM; Muntean, R Eco-Efficient Analysis of a Refurbishment Proposal for a Social Housing(2020)Sustainability, 12, 17 |