Knowledge Agora



Similar Articles

Title Comparative analysis of environmental costs, economic return and social impact of national-level municipal solid waste management schemes in Thailand
ID_Doc 69144
Authors Talang, RPN; Sirivithayapakorn, S
Title Comparative analysis of environmental costs, economic return and social impact of national-level municipal solid waste management schemes in Thailand
Year 2022
Published
Abstract This research comparatively investigates fifteen national-level integrated municipal solid waste (MSW) man-agement schemes and determines the most preferable MSW scheme that attaches equal importance to the environmental, economic, and social impacts. The fifteen schemes are one business as usual (BAU) scheme, seven composting-and seven biogas production-oriented schemes. All the MSW schemes rely on incinerators and refuse derived fuel (RDF) processing for waste disposal. The environmental impacts and costs are quantified by Step-wise2006 based on ecoinvent database. The economic return is evaluated based on the net present value of the construction and operation cost. The affected local community area is the indicator of public perception toward the waste disposal projects (i.e., social impact). The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is used to determine the most preferable scheme. The results showed that MSW combustion by incineration and RDF is the main contributor of environmental impacts. The environmental costs of composting schemes were lower than those of biogas production schemes. Total environmental cost of scheme 7 (i.e., 25% recycling, 50% decomposing, 5% biogas production, two incineration plants, and seven RDF plants) is the lowest (7492.63 billion THB2020). The cash inflow of BAU is lowest and the cash outflow is highest. In comparison with the biogas production schemes, the cash inflows and outflows of composting schemes are lower. Scheme 7 is the most preferable MSW man-agement scheme, given the highest AHP priority score (0.228). Therefore, the composting-incineration-RDF scheme (scheme 7) should be adopted to treat biodegradable and combustible waste.
PDF

Similar Articles

ID Score Article
66446 Hoang, NH; Fogarassy, C Sustainability Evaluation of Municipal Solid Waste Management System for Hanoi (Vietnam)-Why to Choose the 'Waste-to-Energy' Concept(2020)Sustainability, 12, 3
68800 Tan, ST; Lee, CT; Hashim, H; Ho, WS; Lim, JS Optimal process network for municipal solid waste management in Iskandar Malaysia(2014)
18315 Iqbal, A; Yasar, A; Nizami, AS; Haider, R; Sultan, IA; Kedwaii, AA; Chaudhary, MM; Javed, MH; Ahmad, A; Sajid, K; Naqvi, M; Ghori, MU Empirical analysis of cost-effective and equitable solid waste management systems: Environmental and economic perspectives(2024)
10211 Klavenieks, K; Dzene, KP; Blumberga, D Optimal strategies for municipal solid waste treatment - environmental and socio-economic criteria assessment(2017)
17266 Usapein, P; Chavalparit, O Development of sustainable waste management toward zero landfill waste for the petrochemical industry in Thailand using a comprehensive 3R methodology: A case study(2014)Waste Management & Research, 32, 6
13715 Tyagi, VK; Kapoor, A; Arora, P; Banu, JR; Das, S; Pipesh, S; Kazmi, AA Mechanical-biological treatment of municipal solid waste: Case study of 100 TPD Goa plant, India(2021)
66228 Gul-E-Hina; Haydar, S A system dynamics model and analytical hierarchy process: an integrated approach for achieving sustainable solid waste management system(2024)Environmental Science And Pollution Research, 31, 5
77384 Gupta, R; Hirani, H; Shankar, R Sustainable solid waste management system using technology-enabled end-of-pipe strategies(2023)
5235 Yong, ZJ; Bashir, MJK; Hassan, MS Biogas and biofertilizer production from organic fraction municipal solid waste for sustainable circular economy and environmental protection in Malaysia(2021)
29036 Kurniawan, TA; Avtar, R; Singh, D; Xue, WC; Othman, MHD; Hwang, GH; Iswanto, I; Albadarin, AB; Kern, AO Reforming MSWM in Sukunan (Yogjakarta, Indonesia): A case-study of applying a zero-waste approach based on circular economy paradigm(2021)
Scroll