| Title | Is sharing the solution? Exploring public acceptability of the sharing economy |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 74089 |
| Authors | Cherry, CE; Pidgeon, NF |
| Title | Is sharing the solution? Exploring public acceptability of the sharing economy |
| Year | 2018 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | Advocated as a solution to a range of economic, environmental and social problems, the sharing economy has grown rapidly in recent years. However, despite rising up the political agenda, the concept has been increasingly critiqued in relation to unintended economic and social consequences. Whilst existing research has explored the motivations of existing participants in sharing-based practices and business models, little is yet known about wider public perceptions of the sharing economy. Investigating public discourses, this paper explores how citizens may respond to attempts to mainstream the sharing economy, discussing wider desires and concerns surrounding the concept. In a series of four two-day workshops (n = 51), we utilised deliberative research methods to engage participants in discussion surrounding the sharing economy and its role within a more sustainable, resource efficient future. Overall, positive perceptions dominated discussions, with participants independently highlighting reduced waste and resource use, increased access to unaffordable goods, and increased community cohesion as key benefits of sharing. However, echoing existing critiques, a number of concerns were also raised. Our findings suggest that, in addition to personal interests (such as affordability, convenience, and hygiene), public acceptability of the sharing economy was contingent on it meeting a number of broader social values. These include desire to: foster social equality, in relation to both the opportunity and benefits promised by the sharing economy; encourage and support the development of strong and independent local communities; and ensure that business practices operate fairly in the shared interest of business, consumers and the environment. Given the implications for everyday life and consumption practices, we argue public perspectives need to be given consideration within the debate surrounding which aspects of the sharing economy should, and should not, be fostered. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. |
| https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.278 |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
69317
|
Gábor, D; Lajos, B Dilemmas of defining the sharing economy(2019)Ter Es Tarsadalom, 33.0, 1 | |
| 19517
|
Curtis, SK; Lehner, M Defining the Sharing Economy for Sustainability(2019)Sustainability, 11.0, 3 | |
| 75428
|
Plewnia, F; Guenther, E Mapping the sharing economy for sustainability research(2018)Management Decision, 56, 3 | |
| 18295
|
Ranjbari, M; Morales-Alonso, G; Carrasco-Gallego, R Conceptualizing the Sharing Economy through Presenting a Comprehensive Framework(2018)Sustainability, 10.0, 7 | |
| 69281
|
Markeeva, AV Conceptualizing and Key Development Factors of the Sharing Economy in Contemporary Environment(2021)Postmodern Openings, 12.0, 3 | |
| 76519
|
Akbar, P; Hoffmann, S Collaborative space: framework for collaborative consumption and the sharing economy(2023)Journal Of Services Marketing, 37, 4 | |
| 18228
|
Wang, D; Yan, L; Ruan, FL; Zeng, XH An Abductive Analysis of Debates on the Impact of the Sharing Economy: A Systematic Review in a Sustainable Framework(2022)Sustainability, 14.0, 7 | |
| 78037
|
Pérez-Pérez, C; Benito-Osorio, D; García-Moreno, SM; Martínez-Fernández, A Is Sharing a Better Alternative for the Planet? The Contribution of Sharing Economy to Sustainable Development Goals(2021)Sustainability, 13, 4 | |
| 6786
|
Frenken, K Political economies and environmental futures for the sharing economy(2017)Philosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society A-Mathematical Physical And Engineering Sciences, 375, 2095 | |
| 12466
|
Dimante, D; Tambovceva, T; Atstaja, D Development Of Sharing Economy: Analysis Of Different Countries' Experiences(2018) |