| Title | A review of the state of the art in tools and techniques used to evaluate remanufacturing feasibility |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 74309 |
| Authors | Goodall, P; Rosamond, E; Harding, J |
| Title | A review of the state of the art in tools and techniques used to evaluate remanufacturing feasibility |
| Year | 2014 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | Remanufacturing often seems a sensible approach for companies looking to adopt sustainable business plans to achieve long term success. However, remanufacturing must not be treated as a panacea for achieving a sustainable business, as issues such as market demand, product design, end of life condition and information uncertainty can affect the success of a remanufacturing endeavour. Businesses therefore need to carefully assess the feasibility of adopting remanufacturing before committing to a particular activity or strategy. To aid this decision process, a number of tools and techniques have been published by academics. However, there is currently not a formal review and comparison of these tools and how they relate to the decision process. The main research objective of this study has therefore been to identify tools and methods which have been developed within academia to support the decision process of assessing and evaluating the viability of conducting remanufacturing, and evaluate how they have met the requirements of the decision stage. This has been achieved by conducting a content analysis. Three bibliographic databases were searched (Compendex, Web of Science and Scopus) using a structured keyword search to identify relevant literature. The identified tools were then split into 6 categories based upon the specific decision stages and applications, then evaluated against a set of key criteria which are, the decision factors (economic, environmental, social) and the inclusion of uncertainty. The key finding of this study has been that although decision factors are generally well covered, operational tools and the use of uncertainty are often neglected. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
| https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/A_review_of_the_state_of_the_art_in_tools_and_techniques_used_to_evaluate_remanufacturing_feasibility/9572381/1/files/17206427.pdf |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
29417
|
Fera, M; Caterino, M; Hartono, N; Turino, MA; Abbate, R; Manco, P; Miranda, S; Riemma, S; Macchiaroli, R Remanufacturing Decision-Making Tools: A State of the Art(2024) | |
| 7202
|
Ismail, HN; Zwolinski, P; Mandil, G; Brissaud, D Decision making system for designing products and production systems for remanufacturing activities(2017) | |
| 74791
|
Ijomah, WL Addressing decision making for remanufacturing operations and design-for-remanufacture(2009)International Journal Of Sustainable Engineering, 2, 2 | |
| 9971
|
Sitcharangsie, S; Ijomah, W; Wong, TC Decision makings in key remanufacturing activities to optimise remanufacturing outcomes: A review(2019) | |
| 5225
|
Duberg, JV; Johansson, G; Sundin, E; Kurilova-Palisaitiene, J Prerequisite factors for original equipment manufacturer remanufacturing(2020) | |
| 10856
|
Lahrour, Y; Brissaud, D; Zwolinski, P The strategy for implementing remanufacturing process in a commercial enterprise, the case study of a French company(2019) | |
| 20532
|
Fofou, RF; Jiang, ZG; Wang, Y A Review on the Lifecycle Strategies Enhancing Remanufacturing(2021)Applied Sciences-Basel, 11, 13 | |
| 68264
|
Ozcan, S; Corum, A A Scientometric Analysis of Remanufacturing by Mapping Scientific, Organizational, and National Concentration Zones(2021)Ieee Transactions On Engineering Management, 68, 4 | |
| 2886
|
Singhal, D; Tripathy, S; Jena, SK Remanufacturing for the circular economy: Study and evaluation of critical factors(2020) | |
| 23081
|
Paul, M; Eickholt, D; Reinhart, G Framework for adaptable remanufacturing(2024)Production And Manufacturing Research-An Open Access Journal, 12, 1 |