| Title | Prioritising risk mitigation strategies for environmentally sustainable clothing supply chains: Insights from selected organisational theories |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 75778 |
| Authors | Majumdar, A; Sinha, SK; Govindan, K |
| Title | Prioritising risk mitigation strategies for environmentally sustainable clothing supply chains: Insights from selected organisational theories |
| Year | 2021 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | Recent outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic has provided strong impetus to supply chain resilience research. In a volatile and uncertain business environment, resilience can be incorporated by developing and implementing effective risk mitigation strategies. In this research, risk mitigation strategies for environmentally sustainable clothing supply chain have been prioritised by considering their efficacy to mitigate various risks. Twelve risks and thirteen mitigation strategies, identified through literature review and experts' opinion, are considered as decision criteria and alternatives respectively. Fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solutions (fuzzy TOPSIS) is implemented under a group decision making scenario for prioritising the strategies. Developing supply chain agility; multiple green sourcing and flexible capacities; adoption of green practices; building trust, coordination and collaboration; and alignment of economic incentives and revenue sharing are found to be dominant risk mitigation strategies for environmentally sustainable clothing supply chain. These strategies have been viewed through the lens of resource dependence, change management and transaction cost theories. Organisation desirous to build resilience in their supply chain can prioritise the risk mitigation strategies and adopt a portfolio of strategies based on the outcome of this research. (C) 2021 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. |
| https://europepmc.org/articles/pmc8536944?pdf=render |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
74235
|
Ayyildiz, E Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process-based green supply chain resilience evaluation methodology in post COVID-19 era(2023)Environmental Science And Pollution Research, 30, 15 | |
| 77146
|
Kumar, A; Mangla, SK; Kumar, P; Song, ML Mitigate risks in perishable food supply chains: Learning from COVID-19(2021) | |
| 18557
|
Du, JG; Solangi, YA Sustainability in Pakistan's textile industry: analyzing barriers and strategies for green supply chain management implementation(2023)Environmental Science And Pollution Research, 30.0, 20 | |
| 69074
|
Sutrisno, A; Kumar, V Supply chain sustainability risk assessment model using integration of the preference selection index (PSI) and the Shannon entropy(2023)International Journal Of Quality & Reliability Management, 40, 3 | |
| 18366
|
Moktadir, MA; Dwivedi, A; Khan, NS; Paul, SK; Khan, SA; Ahmed, S; Sultana, R Analysis of risk factors in sustainable supply chain management in an emerging economy of leather industry(2021) | |
| 78611
|
Jakhar, SK Performance evaluation and a flow allocation decision model for a sustainable supply chain of an apparel industry(2015) | |
| 76337
|
Tseng, ML; Bui, TD; Lim, MK; Fujii, M; Mishra, U Assessing data-driven sustainable supply chain management indicators for the textile industry under industrial disruption and ambidexterity(2022) | |
| 73434
|
Vergara, JIT; Martínez, JAS; Lucio, DO Resilient and sustainable supply chain criteria for performance evaluation: selection and ranking through fuzzy Delphi(2024)Benchmarking-An International Journal, 31, 3 | |
| 25946
|
Krstic, M; Agnusdei, L; Palmi, P; Balezentis, T Enabling organizations to strategically manage risks in circular supply chains(2024) | |
| 68026
|
Zhu, XQ; Wu, YJ How Does Supply Chain Resilience Affect Supply Chain Performance? The Mediating Effect of Sustainability(2022)Sustainability, 14, 21 |