| Title | Tax-subsidy or reward-penalty? Determining optimal strategy in sustainable closed-loop supply chain under quality-dependent return |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 76718 |
| Authors | Mondal, C; Giri, BC |
| Title | Tax-subsidy or reward-penalty? Determining optimal strategy in sustainable closed-loop supply chain under quality-dependent return |
| Year | 2023 |
| Published | International Journal Of Systems Science-Operations & Logistics, 10, 1 |
| Abstract | In today's competitive business world, focusing solely on financial considerations can limit market demand in any industry. Keeping this in mind, this study deals with a sustainable closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) comprising an environmentally conscious manufacturer, a retailer, and a third-party collector (TPC) under the influence of government intervention. The manufacturer offers a return policy for the defective product up to a certain time, and the TPC offers an acquisition price to consumers for returning their used products. The government can offer no intervention or a tax-subsidy policy in the forward logistics, or a reward-penalty mechanism (RPM) in the reverse logistics, or both. Relying on different government policies, four models are developed first. After that, two collaborative models, viz. manufacturer-retailer collaboration and manufacturer-TPC collaboration, are developed for improving channel performance under the manufacturer-led Stackelberg gaming approach. Numerical results disclose that the government subsidy to consumers provides better functionality to channel individuals, consumers, and the environment. If the government considers imposing a tax, the RPM can help to improve channel execution marginally. A collaborative strategy between the manufacturer and the retailer under government taxation and RPM becomes the most efficient strategy for enhancing the triple bottom line of sustainability. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
76901
|
Lyu, S; Chen, YY; Wang, L Optimal Decisions in a Multi-Party Closed-Loop Supply Chain Considering Green Marketing and Carbon Tax Policy(2022)International Journal Of Environmental Research And Public Health, 19, 15 | |
| 22001
|
Ziaei, M; Ameli, M; Rasti-Barzoki, M; Shavandi, A A game-theoretic approach for pricing in a dual-channel socially responsible closed-loop supply chain under reward-penalty mechanism(2024) | |
| 74151
|
Ebrahimi, S; Hosseini-Motlagh, SM; Nematollahi, M; Cardenas-Barron, LE Coordinating double-level sustainability effort in a sustainable supply chain under cap-and-trade regulation(2022) | |
| 9142
|
Zhang, ZY; Yu, LY Altruistic mode selection and coordination in a low-carbon closed-loop supply chain under the government's compound subsidy: A differential game analysis(2022) | |
| 15416
|
Zhang, ZY; Yu, LY Dynamic decision-making and coordination of low-carbon closed-loop supply chain considering different power structures and government double subsidy(2023)Clean Technologies And Environmental Policy, 25, 1 | |
| 6945
|
Liao, BF; Shang, YC; Sun, YY Optimal decisions of closed-loop supply chain under government recycling subsidy and value co-creation(2023) | |
| 28425
|
Alizadeh-Basban, N; Taleizadeh, AA A hybrid circular economy - Game theoretical approach in a dual-channel green supply chain considering sale's effort, delivery time, and hybrid remanufacturing(2020) | |
| 13334
|
Zhang, N; Li, B Pricing and Coordination of Green Closed-Loop Supply Chain With Fairness Concerns(2020) | |
| 10352
|
Xue, KL; Sun, GH; Wang, YY; Niu, SY Optimal Pricing and Green Product Design Strategies in a Sustainable Supply Chain Considering Government Subsidy and Different Channel Power Structures(2021)Sustainability, 13, 22 | |
| 77229
|
Arbabiun, P; Chutani, A; Touboulic, A Optimal sustainability efforts and pricing policies in a two-echelon supply chain(2022)Ifac Papersonline, 55, 10 |