| Title | Stakeholder prioritizations for electric vehicle charging across time periods |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 77298 |
| Authors | van der Koogh, M; Chappin, E; Heller, R; Lukszo, Z |
| Title | Stakeholder prioritizations for electric vehicle charging across time periods |
| Year | 2023 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | Electric vehicles have penetrated the Dutch market, which increases the potential for decreased local emissions, the use and storage of sustainable energy, and the roll-out and use of electric car-sharing business models. This development also raises new potential issues such as increased electricity demand, a lack of social acceptance, and infrastructural challenges in the built environment. Relevant stakeholders, such as policymakers and service providers, need to align their values and prioritize these aspects. Our study investigates the prioritization of 11 Dutch decision-makers in the field of public electric vehicle charging. These decision-makers prioritized different indicators related to measurements (e.g., EV adoption rates or charge point profitability), organization (such as fast- or smart-charging), and developments (e.g., the development of mobility-service markets) using the bestworst method. The indicators within these categories were prioritized for three different scenario's in time. The results reveal that priorities will shift from EV adoption and roll-out of infrastructure to managing peak demand, using more sustainable charging techniques (such as V2G), and using sustainable energy towards 2030. Technological advancements and autonomous charging techniques will become more relevant in a later time period, around 2040. Environmental indicators (e.g., local emissions) were consistently valued low, whereas mobility indicators were valued differently across participants, indicating a lack of consensus. Smart charging was consistently valued higher than other charging techniques, independent of time period. The results also revealed that there are some distinct differences between the priorities of policymakers and service providers. Having a systematic overview of what aspects matter supports the policy discussion around EVs in the built environment. |
| https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.09.003 |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
69872
|
Pardo-Bosch, F; Pujadas, P; Morton, C; Cervera, C Sustainable deployment of an electric vehicle public charging infrastructure network from a city business model perspective(2021) | |
| 70342
|
Doumen, S; Paterakis, NG Economic Viability of Smart Charging EVs in the Dutch Ancillary Service Markets(2019) | |
| 37536
|
Ghasemlou, SM; Ochoa-Zezzatti, A; Torres, V; Martinez, E; Lopez, V Implementation of Time Series to Determine Purchase and Use of Electric Cars in a Smart City Considering Generation Z as Target Population(2024) | |
| 65573
|
Gautam, D; Bolia, N Understanding consumer choices and attitudes toward electric vehicles: A study of purchasing behavior and policy implications(2024) | |
| 67534
|
Chen, XP; Jiang, X; Yu, XC; Hao, P; Xie, BC What factors affect the development of public charging infrastructures? a study from the perspective of potential users(2024) | |
| 77222
|
Nilsson, M; Nykvist, B Governing the electric vehicle transition - Near term interventions to support a green energy economy(2016) | |
| 42761
|
Skjolsvold, TM; Henriksen, IM; Ryghaug, M Beyond the car: how electric vehicles may enable new forms of material politics at the intersection of the smart grid and smart city(2022) | |
| 68037
|
Thiel, C; Tsakalidis, A; Jäger-Waldau, A Will Electric Vehicles Be Killed (again) or Are They the Next Mobility Killer App?(2020)Energies, 13, 7 | |
| 68703
|
Avci, B; Girotra, K; Netessine, S Electric Vehicles with a Battery Switching Station: Adoption and Environmental Impact(2015)Management Science, 61, 4 | |
| 67435
|
Ball, CS; Vögele, S; Grajewski, M; Kuckshinrichs, W E-mobility from a multi-actor point of view: Uncertainties and their impacts(2021) |