| Title | The evolution of the Italian EPR system for the management of household Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE). Technical and economic performance in the spotlight |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 8846 |
| Authors | Favot, M; Veit, R; Massarutto, A |
| Title | The evolution of the Italian EPR system for the management of household Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE). Technical and economic performance in the spotlight |
| Year | 2016 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | In this paper we analyse the Italian collective system for the management of household Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE), and its evolution over time, following the European Directives on WEEE, which include the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR). The analysis focuses on the technical and economic performance of WEEE compliance organisations (consortia), as they are the key players in the Italian EPR regime. Economic results have not usually been provided in previous studies, due to the lack of available data. This study overcomes this problem by accessing the financial statements for the years 2009-2014 of all consortia. The main conclusions of the study are: The Italian EPR system barely exceeded the technical target of the first WEEE Directive (4 kg per capita). Improvements are necessary to achieve the target set for 2019 by the Recast Directive. The economic performance of the Italian EPR regime improved significantly over time. The fees charged per tonne of WEEE collected decreased by almost 43% from 652 Euro per tonne in 2009 to 374 Euro per tonne in 2014, while the fees per tonne put on the market (P0M) were 134 Euro in 2009 and 104 Euro in 2014. The results prove the theory which states that, competing consortia use the learning effects to reduce the contribution fees for producers rather than to increase the quantity collected. Municipalities remain the most important actor in WEEE collection operations. Consortia compensate municipalities with a reimbursement that ranges between 28 and 38 Euros per tonne collected. These repayments cover only partially their costs. Additional studies should investigate their role. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
14202
|
Wang, HD; Gu, YF; Li, LQ; Liu, TL; Wu, YF; Zuo, TY Operating models and development trends in the extended producer responsibility system for waste electrical and electronic equipment(2017) | |
| 6231
|
Favot, M; Grassetti, L; Massarutto, A; Veit, R Regulation and competition in the extended producer responsibility models: Results in the WEEE sector in Europe(2022) | |
| 4871
|
Isernia, R; Passaro, R; Quinto, I; Thomas, A The Reverse Supply Chain of the E-Waste Management Processes in a Circular Economy Framework: Evidence from Italy(2019)Sustainability, 11, 8 | |
| 26873
|
Andersen, T A comparative study of national variations of the European WEEE directive: manufacturer's view(2022)Environmental Science And Pollution Research, 29, 14 | |
| 16787
|
Ghisellini, P; Passaro, R; Ulgiati, S Environmental and Social Life Cycle Assessment of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Management in Italy According to EU Directives(2023)Environments, 10, 7 | |
| 5725
|
Ghisellini, P; Quinto, I; Passaro, R; Ulgiati, S Circular Economy Management of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) in Italian Urban Systems: Comparison and Perspectives(2023)Sustainability, 15, 11 | |
| 6471
|
Favot, M; Grassetti, L E-waste collection in Italy: Results from an exploratory analysis(2017) |