| Title | Decision makings in key remanufacturing activities to optimise remanufacturing outcomes: A review |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 9971 |
| Authors | Sitcharangsie, S; Ijomah, W; Wong, TC |
| Title | Decision makings in key remanufacturing activities to optimise remanufacturing outcomes: A review |
| Year | 2019 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | The importance of remanufacturing has been increasing since stricter regulations on protecting the environment were enforced. Remanufacturing is considered as the main means of retaining value from used products and components in order to drive a circular economy. However, it is more complex than traditional manufacturing due to the uncertainties associated with the quality, quantities and return timing of used products and components. Over the past few years, various methods of optimising remanufacturing outcomes have been developed to make decisions such as identifying the best End-Of-Life (EOL) options, acquiring the right amounts of cores, deciding the most suitable disassembly level, applying suitable cleaning techniques, and considering product commonality across different product families. A decision being made at one remanufacturing activity will greatly affect the decisions at subsequent activities, which will affect remanufacturing outcomes, i.e. productivity, economic performance effectiveness, and the proportion of core that can be salvaged. Therefore, a holistic way of integrating different decisions over multiple remanufacturing activities is needed to improve remanufacturing outcomes, which is a major knowledge gap. This paper reviews current remanufacturing practice in order to highlight both the challenges and opportunities, and more importantly, offers useful insights on how such a knowledge gap can be bridged. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
29417
|
Fera, M; Caterino, M; Hartono, N; Turino, MA; Abbate, R; Manco, P; Miranda, S; Riemma, S; Macchiaroli, R Remanufacturing Decision-Making Tools: A State of the Art(2024) | |
| 20532
|
Fofou, RF; Jiang, ZG; Wang, Y A Review on the Lifecycle Strategies Enhancing Remanufacturing(2021)Applied Sciences-Basel, 11, 13 | |
| 5225
|
Duberg, JV; Johansson, G; Sundin, E; Kurilova-Palisaitiene, J Prerequisite factors for original equipment manufacturer remanufacturing(2020) | |
| 21067
|
Diener, DL; Kushnir, D; Tillman, AM Scrap happens: A case of industrial end-users, component remanufacturing outcome(2019) | |
| 74791
|
Ijomah, WL Addressing decision making for remanufacturing operations and design-for-remanufacture(2009)International Journal Of Sustainable Engineering, 2, 2 | |
| 9382
|
Mustajib, MI; Ciptomulyono, U; Kurniati, N A Model for Remanufacturing Process Planning Under Quality Loss and Emissions Constraint with Multi-graded of Incoming Cores(2024) | |
| 74309
|
Goodall, P; Rosamond, E; Harding, J A review of the state of the art in tools and techniques used to evaluate remanufacturing feasibility(2014) | |
| 20758
|
Sierra-Fontalvo, L; Polo-Cardozo, J; Maury-Ramírez, H; Mesa, JA Diagnosing remanufacture potential at product-component level: A disassemblability and integrity approach(2024) | |
| 23572
|
Kurilova-Palisaitiene, J; Sundin, E; Poksinska, B Remanufacturing challenges and possible lean improvements(2018) | |
| 23081
|
Paul, M; Eickholt, D; Reinhart, G Framework for adaptable remanufacturing(2024)Production And Manufacturing Research-An Open Access Journal, 12, 1 |