| Title |
Low-tech approaches for sustainability: key principles from the literature and practice |
| ID_Doc |
23452 |
| Authors |
Tanguy, A; Carrière, L; Laforest, V |
| Title |
Low-tech approaches for sustainability: key principles from the literature and practice |
| Year |
2023 |
| Published |
Sustainability-Science Practice And Policy, 19, 1 |
| DOI |
10.1080/15487733.2023.2170143 |
| Abstract |
Low-tech approaches have come to the fore in the last few years, mainly in opposition to the techno-optimistic model proposed to solve current and future environmental crises. However, low-tech thinking is multifaceted, making the concept potentially rich but also vague. This article develops a seven-principle framework to categorize low-tech concepts based on an abductive approach which included a literature review and interviews with low-tech actors. Principle occurrence was assessed among the authors and interviewees. The results demonstrate that the low-tech movement entails more than a shift to robust and less-consumptive technical artifacts. While resource efficiency and material reuse are important traits of low-tech approaches, technical appropriation is the most frequently cited key principle in the literature and by the actors. This delineation into several principles can help to differentiate low-tech from other sustainability concepts related to resource conservation such as frugal innovations and circular economy. We aim in this article to open a discussion about the ways low-tech proponents are seeking to introduce transformative development pathways to sustainability. |
| Author Keywords |
Low-tech; sustainability; principles; defining framework; development pathways |
| Index Keywords |
Index Keywords |
| Document Type |
Other |
| Open Access |
Open Access |
| Source |
Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) |
| EID |
WOS:000928704800001 |
| WoS Category |
Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Studies |
| Research Area |
Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology |
| PDF |
https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2023.2170143
|