| Title |
Livestock waste management for energy recovery in Brazil: a life cycle assessment approach |
| ID_Doc |
25094 |
| Authors |
Hollas, CE; do Amaral, KGC; Lange, MV; Higarashi, MM; Steinmetz, RLR; Mariani, LF; Nakano, V; Sanches-Pereira, A; Jannuzzi, GD; Kunz, A |
| Title |
Livestock waste management for energy recovery in Brazil: a life cycle assessment approach |
| Year |
2024 |
| Published |
Environmental Science And Pollution Research, 31, 3 |
| DOI |
10.1007/s11356-023-31452-1 |
| Abstract |
Livestock farming has exerted intense environmental pressure on our planet. The high emissions to the environment and the high demands of resources for the production process have encouraged the search for decarbonization and circularity in the livestock sector. In this context, the objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the environmental performance of two different uses for biogas generated in the anaerobic digestion of animal waste, either for electricity generation or biomethane. For this purpose, a life cycle assessment approach was applied to evaluate the potential of anaerobic digestion as a management technology for three different livestock wastes, related to beef cattle, dairy, and sheep in the Brazilian animal production context. The results suggest that the treatment scenarios focusing on biomethane generation were able to mitigate the highest percentage of damages (77 to 108%) in the global warming category when compared to the scenarios without the use of anaerobic digestion (3.00 center dot 102 to 3.71 center dot 103 kgCO2 eq) or in the perspective of electricity generation (mitigation of 74 to 96%). In terms of freshwater eutrophication, the generation of electricity (- 2.17 center dot 10-2 to 2.31 center dot 10-3 kg P eq) is more favorable than the purification of biogas to biomethane (- 1.73 center dot 10-2 to 2.44 center dot 10-3 kg P eq), due to the loss of methane in the upgrading process. In terms of terrestrial ecotoxicity, all scenarios are very similar, with negative values (- 1.19 center dot 101 to - 7.17 center dot 102 kg 1,4-DCB) due to the benefit of nutrient recovery, especially nitrogen, associated with the use of digestate as fertilizer, which was one of the critical points in all scenarios. Based on these results, it is evident that proper management of all stages of the treatment life cycle is the key to decarbonization and circularity in livestock waste management. The biogas use does not present different effects on the environmental performance of the scenarios studied, demonstrating that the purpose should be chosen according to the needs of each plant or management system. |
| Author Keywords |
Biogas; Anaerobic digestion; Circular economy; Manure; Waste to energy; Biomethane |
| Index Keywords |
Index Keywords |
| Document Type |
Other |
| Open Access |
Open Access |
| Source |
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) |
| EID |
WOS:001127334200013 |
| WoS Category |
Environmental Sciences |
| Research Area |
Environmental Sciences & Ecology |
| PDF |
|