| Title |
Circular economy performance and carbon footprint of wind turbine blade waste management alternatives |
| ID_Doc |
28594 |
| Authors |
Diez-Cañamero, B; Mendoza, JMF |
| Title |
Circular economy performance and carbon footprint of wind turbine blade waste management alternatives |
| Year |
2023 |
| Published |
|
| DOI |
10.1016/j.wasman.2023.03.041 |
| Abstract |
It is estimated that 570 Mt of blade waste, whose management is complex and expensive, will be generated by 2030 in the European Union alone. Accordingly, alternative blade waste management techniques are being investigated to optimize material recovery. This study evaluates the correlation between the circular economy performance and the carbon footprint of seven end-of-life management solutions for wind turbine blades: repurposing, grinding, solvolysis, pyrolysis, co-processing in cement kilns, incineration with energy recovery and landfilling. The circular economy performance is analyzed through the calculation of the product circularity indicator, while the carbon footprint is determined through life cycle assessment, using the global warming indicator and considering the management of three blades from cradle-to-gate as functional unit. As the per-formance of solvolysis and pyrolysis recycling is expected to change in the future, a sensitivity analysis is also carried out to evaluate the variability of the results by changing their process efficiency and the quality of the recovered materials. The results indicate that blade recycling through solvolysis is the most circular (0.47-0.77) and low-carbon (225-503 CO2 eq.) solution overall. Blade repurposing, grinding and cement co-processing have a similar circularity (0.52-0.55) and a global warming impact ranging from 499 t CO2 eq. to 615 t CO2 eq. Although the circularity of pyrolysis is 59% (0.35) to 118% (0.48) greater than the circularity of incineration and landfilling (0.22), its carbon footprint can range from 566 t CO2 eq. to 744 t CO2 eq, which could be up to 19% higher than the carbon footprint of these linear EoL management alternatives (623 t CO2). Based on these findings, proposals for sustainable industrial innovation and methodological recommendations for the devel-opment of integrated circularity and sustainability studies are proposed. |
| Author Keywords |
Circularity indicators; Life cycle assessment; Pyrolysis; Renewable energy; Solvolysis; Sustainable energy transition |
| Index Keywords |
Index Keywords |
| Document Type |
Other |
| Open Access |
Open Access |
| Source |
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) |
| EID |
WOS:000980066600001 |
| WoS Category |
Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences |
| Research Area |
Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology |
| PDF |
|