| Title |
Nudging NIMBY: Do positive messages regarding the benefits of increased housing density influence resident stated housing development preferences? |
| ID_Doc |
41836 |
| Authors |
Doberstein, C; Hickey, R; Li, E |
| Title |
Nudging NIMBY: Do positive messages regarding the benefits of increased housing density influence resident stated housing development preferences? |
| Year |
2016 |
| Published |
|
| DOI |
10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.02.025 |
| Abstract |
Do positive messages regarding the benefits of increased housing density influence resident stated housing development preferences? We employ an experimental research design to test the efficacy of positive messages regarding increased housing density to reduce observed NIMBYism (Not In My Back Yard). Using a survey-based experiment, we compared four messages: a notification of the public benefits; the private benefits; a social comparison drawing on expert knowledge of housing preferences; and a control stating recent trends in the municipality. Our sample of 202 residents of a mid-sized Canadian city indicates that messages regarding the public benefits of increased density reduced NIMBYism by four times the control message. We find some evidence in favor of the efficacy of the social comparison treatment as well. We discuss these findings with reference to the literature on smart city growth, and the policy implications that emerge. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
| Author Keywords |
NIMBYism; Housing density; Public opinion; Smart city growth; Framing theory; Public preferences; Contingent valuation |
| Index Keywords |
Index Keywords |
| Document Type |
Other |
| Open Access |
Open Access |
| Source |
Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) |
| EID |
WOS:000375517900027 |
| WoS Category |
Environmental Studies |
| Research Area |
Environmental Sciences & Ecology |
| PDF |
|