| Title |
From a Comprehensive Pool to a Project-Specific List of Key Performance Indicators for Monitoring the Positive Energy Transition of Smart Cities-An Experience-Based Approach |
| ID_Doc |
43004 |
| Authors |
Angelakoglou, K; Kourtzanidis, K; Giourka, P; Apostolopoulos, V; Nikolopoulos, N; Kantorovitch, J |
| Title |
From a Comprehensive Pool to a Project-Specific List of Key Performance Indicators for Monitoring the Positive Energy Transition of Smart Cities-An Experience-Based Approach |
| Year |
2020 |
| Published |
Smart Cities, 3, 3 |
| DOI |
10.3390/smartcities3030036 |
| Abstract |
As cities grow rapidly and energy needs increase, shaping an effective energy transition is a top priority towards urban sustainability and smart development. This study attempts to answer three key research questions that can help city authorities, planners and interested agents simplify and increase the transparency of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) selection for smart city and communities (SCC) projects focusing on energy transition and creation of Positive Energy Districts (PEDs): Question 1: "What resources are available for extracting such KPIs?"; Question 2: "Which of those KPIs are the most suitable for assessing the energy transition of smart city projects and PED-related developments?" and Question 3: "How can a project-specific shortlist of KPIs be developed?". Answering these questions can also serve as a major first step towards a "universal" KPI selection procedure. In line with this purpose, an experiential approach is presented, capitalizing on knowledge and lessons learned from an ongoing smart city project in Europe (POCITYF) that focuses on PED deployment. Under this framework, a) a review of smart city KPI frameworks has been conducted, resulting in a pool of 258 indicators that can potentially be adopted by smart city projects; b) eight key dimensions of evaluations were extracted, setting a holistic performance framework relevant to SCCs; c) a detailed evaluation process including pre-determined criteria and city-needs feedback was applied to shortlist the KPI pool, leading to a ready-to-be-used, project-specific list of 63 KPIs and d) KPIs were sorted and analyzed in different granularity levels to further facilitate the monitoring procedure. The experiential procedure presented in this study can be easily adapted to the needs of every smart city project, serving as a recommendation guide. |
| Author Keywords |
assessment; monitoring; KPI; PED; performance; selection |
| Index Keywords |
Index Keywords |
| Document Type |
Other |
| Open Access |
Open Access |
| Source |
Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) |
| EID |
WOS:000682786300008 |
| WoS Category |
Engineering, Electrical & Electronic; Urban Studies |
| Research Area |
Engineering; Urban Studies |
| PDF |
https://www.mdpi.com/2624-6511/3/3/36/pdf?version=1595080692
|