Knowledge Agora



Scientific Article details

Title Reviewing the Market Stability Reserve in light of more ambitious EU ETS emission targets
ID_Doc 64334
Authors Osorio, S; Tietjen, O; Pahle, M; Pietzcker, RC; Edenhofer, O
Title Reviewing the Market Stability Reserve in light of more ambitious EU ETS emission targets
Year 2021
Published
DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112530
Abstract The stringency of the EU's Emission Trading System (ETS) is bound to be ratcheted-up to deliver on more ambitious goals as formulated in the EU's Green Deal. Tightening the cap needs to consider the interactions with the Market Stability Reserve (MSR), which will be reviewed in 2021. We analyse these issues using the model LIMES-EU. First, we examine how revising MSR parameters impacts allowance cancellations. We find that varying key design parameters leads to cancellations in the range of 2.6-7.9 Gt - compared to 5.1 Gt under current regulation. Overall, the bank thresholds, which define when there is intake to/outtake from the MSR, have the highest impact. Intake rates above 12% only have a limited effect, and cause oscillatory intake behaviour. Second, we analyse how more ambitious climate 2030 targets can be achieved by adjusting the linear reduction factor (LRF). We find that the LRF increases MSR cancellations substantially up to 10.0 Gt. This implies that increasing its value from currently 2.2% to only 2.6% could be consistent with an EU-wide target of-55% by 2030. However, MSR cancellations are subject to large uncertainty, which increases the complexity of the market and induces high price uncertainty.
Author Keywords EU climate Policy; EU ETS reform; Linear reduction factor (LRF); Market stability reserve (MSR); EU ETS Phase IV
Index Keywords Index Keywords
Document Type Other
Open Access Open Access
Source Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
EID WOS:000696785000011
WoS Category Economics; Energy & Fuels; Environmental Sciences; Environmental Studies
Research Area Business & Economics; Energy & Fuels; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
PDF https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112530
Similar atricles
Scroll