| Title |
Integrated sustainability assessment of repurposing onshore abandoned wells for geothermal power generation |
| ID_Doc |
7674 |
| Authors |
Li, JY; Gallego-Schmid, A; Stamford, L |
| Title |
Integrated sustainability assessment of repurposing onshore abandoned wells for geothermal power generation |
| Year |
2024 |
| Published |
|
| DOI |
10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122670 |
| Abstract |
As global efforts intensify to mitigate climate change through Net-Zero by 2050, the transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources is of utmost importance. Within this context, geothermal power generation is an underestimated yet rapidly developing field with immense potential. A notable opportunity arises from repurposing abandoned oil and gas wells (AOGWs) as alternative sources for geothermal power production. This study employs multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) to examine the techno-sustainability of four geothermal power systems: i) a business-as-usual geothermal power plant (GEO(bau)), ii) repurpose two completely AOGWs for geothermal power generation (R-GEO(double)), iii) repurpose a single completely AOGW (R-GEO(single)), iv) repurpose semi-AOGWs (i.e., wells still in operation but with high water cut, R-GEO(semi)). We assessed 30 criteria across technical, environmental, economic, and social dimensions via the analytical hierarchy process. The study identifies R-GEO(semi) as the most techno-sustainable option due to its superior performance across environmental, economic, and social dimensions. However, GEO(bau) closely follows R-GEO(semi), securing its position as the second-best option, marked by its outstanding technical proficiency and robust environmental and social performance. Conversely, R-GEO(double) and R-GEO(single) show limited techno-sustainability competitiveness. When sensitivity analyses are applied to the weighting factors, R-GEO(semi) demonstrates resilience and remains as the best option in most cases. However, GEO(bau) could outperform R-GEO(semi) when the value of technical criteria is increased (weightings >0.255) or when the weightings for environmental or economic aspects decrease (weightings <0.236 and < 0.244 respectively). R-GEO(double) and R-GEO(single) only overtake GEO(bau) when the economic aspect reaches a weighting of 0.659 or more. Despite R-GEO(semi) being the most promising option, it faces challenges due to limited power generation capacity and the availability of wells approaching their end-of-lives. The findings underline the necessity for broader stakeholder input, inclusion of more technical and social criteria, and data-driven decision-making processes. |
| Author Keywords |
Life cycle techno-sustainability assessment; Renewable electricity; Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA); Energy transition; Geothermal energy; Circular economy |
| Index Keywords |
Index Keywords |
| Document Type |
Other |
| Open Access |
Open Access |
| Source |
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) |
| EID |
WOS:001177557000001 |
| WoS Category |
Energy & Fuels; Engineering, Chemical |
| Research Area |
Energy & Fuels; Engineering |
| PDF |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122670
|