Policy and regulatory challenges in regenerative agriculture hinder widespread adoption of these sustainable practices. One major issue is the lack of supportive policies, as most agricultural subsidies favor conventional farming, which can discourage farmers from transitioning to regenerative methods. Funding for regenerative research and development is often limited, leaving farmers with fewer resources for innovation and knowledge-building. Additionally, there are regulatory barriers that complicate the process for farmers wanting to adopt diverse crop rotations, agroforestry, or holistic grazing. Certification for organic or regenerative practices is complex and costly, often requiring significant time and administrative effort. Zoning laws and land-use regulations may restrict certain regenerative practices, such as integrating livestock with crop production, which is essential for nutrient cycling. Payment-for-ecosystem-services programs, which could reward farmers for improving soil health and biodiversity, are not yet widely implemented. Many small and medium-sized farmers also struggle to access grants and government programs tailored to regenerative agriculture. Without standardized metrics, it’s difficult to measure and verify regenerative outcomes, complicating efforts to establish meaningful incentives. Streamlined, supportive policy changes could make regenerative agriculture more viable and appealing, helping to transform agricultural practices for the long term.