| Title | Effect of Temperature on Co-Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure and Empty Fruit Bunch: A Kinetic Parametric Study |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 10845 |
| Authors | Manogaran, MD; Hakimi, M; Ahmad, MHNB; Shamsuddin, R; Lim, JW; Hassan, MAM; Sahrin, NT |
| Title | Effect of Temperature on Co-Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure and Empty Fruit Bunch: A Kinetic Parametric Study |
| Year | 2023 |
| Published | Sustainability, 15, 7 |
| Abstract | The rapid growth of the Malaysian poultry and palm oil industries has led biomass waste generation in abundance specifically chicken manure and empty fruit bunch (EFB). Anaerobic digestion (AD) is a circular economy-based approach which converts chicken manure and EFB into biogas which can be utilized for heating and power generation. Operating temperature is an imperative consideration for AD hence the objective of the study is to evaluate the effect of different temperature profiles namely, psychrophilic (20 degrees C), mesophilic (35 degrees C) and thermophilic (50 degrees C) on AD of chicken manure and EFB. The kinetic parameters are also evaluated using five kinetic models to enable readers to comprehend the kinetic behaviours of the systems. The volume and composition of biogas is measured every five days for a 50-day retention time. The findings observed that mesophilic condition is the most favourable with cumulative methane, CH4 composition of up to 17.07%, almost two folds that of thermophilic (9.12%) and five folds that of psychrophilic (3.49%). The CH4 generation rate, R-b based on the modified Gompertz model which is deemed the best fit further supports these findings as the Rb under mesophilic condition is significantly higher (0.330 mL/gvs day) compared to psychrophilic (0.088 mL/gvs day) and thermophilic (0.120 mL/gvs day) conditions. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
3603
|
Dhungana, B; Lohani, SP; Marsolek, M Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Food Waste with Livestock Manure at Ambient Temperature: A Biogas Based Circular Economy and Sustainable Development Goals(2022)Sustainability, 14, 6 | |
| 14402
|
Zainal, A; Harun, R; Idrus, S Performance Monitoring of Anaerobic Digestion at Various Organic Loading Rates of Commercial Malaysian Food Waste(2022) | |
| 14483
|
Gavrilescu, D; Bârjoveanu, G; Apopei, P; Gherghel, A; Teodosiu, C Preliminary Performance Evaluation For Chicken Manure Treatment And Valorization Options(2023)Environmental Engineering And Management Journal, 22, 9 | |
| 8864
|
Mlaik, N; Sayadi, S; Masmoudi, MA; Yaacoubi, D; Loukil, S; Khoufi, S Optimization of anaerobic co-digestion of fruit and vegetable waste with animal manure feedstocks using mixture design(2024)Biomass Conversion And Biorefinery, 14.0, 3 | |
| 17606
|
Andriamanohiarisoamanana, FJ; Yasui, S; Yamashiro, T; Ramanoelina, V; Ihara, I; Umetsu, K Anaerobic co-digestion: a sustainable approach to food processing organic waste management(2020)Journal Of Material Cycles And Waste Management, 22, 5 | |
| 10086
|
Bedoic, R; Spehar, A; Puljko, J; Cucek, L; Cosic, B; Puksec, T; Duic, N Opportunities and challenges: Experimental and kinetic analysis of anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and rendering industry streams for biogas production(2020) | |
| 13883
|
Anacleto, TM; Oliveira, HR; Diniz, VL; de Oliveira, VP; Abreu, F; Enrich-Prast, A Boosting manure biogas production with the application of pretreatments: A meta-analysis(2022) | |
| 7987
|
Chew, KR; Leong, HY; Khoo, KS; Vo, DVN; Anjum, H; Chang, CK; Show, PL Effects of anaerobic digestion of food waste on biogas production and environmental impacts: a review(2021)Environmental Chemistry Letters, 19, 4 | |
| 5808
|
Sganzerla, WG; Tena-Villares, M; Buller, LS; Mussatto, SI; Forster-Carneiro, T Dry Anaerobic Digestion of Food Industry by-Products and Bioenergy Recovery: A Perspective to Promote the Circular Economy Transition(2022)Waste And Biomass Valorization, 13, 5 | |
| 10064
|
Caruso, MC; Braghieri, A; Capece, A; Napolitano, F; Romano, P; Galgano, F; Altieri, G; Genovese, F Recent Updates on the Use of Agro-Food Waste for Biogas Production(2019)Applied Sciences-Basel, 9.0, 6 |