| Title | Until death do us part? In-depth insights into Dutch consumers' considerations about product lifetimes and lifetime extension |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 23657 |
| Authors | van den Berge, R; Magnier, L; Mugge, R |
| Title | Until death do us part? In-depth insights into Dutch consumers' considerations about product lifetimes and lifetime extension |
| Year | 2023 |
| Published | Journal Of Industrial Ecology, 27, 3 |
| Abstract | Long-lasting electronic products contribute to a sustainable society; however, both expected and actual lifetimes are in decline. This research provides in-depth insights into consumers' considerations about product lifetimes, barriers to extending lifetimes, and responses to a product lifetime label. Results of interviews (n = 22) with Dutch consumers suggest a positive view on long-lasting products. Nevertheless, their products' value depreciated during their lifetimes. Consumers consider themselves unable to estimate how long products should last, which can be detrimental as low expectations tend to negatively influence actual lifetimes. Also, use intensity and consumers' care(less) behavior influence the lifetime. To extend product lifetimes, consumers often disregard the option of repairing malfunctioning products. They have limited knowledge and ability, and believe repair provides poor value for money. Lifetime extension can also be hindered by market-related factors, such as convenient replacement services, new technological developments, and (attractive) deals. We suggest a product lifetime label should contain relevant and reliable information; furthermore, we recommend including (extended) warranty information. When information about repairability is included, potential negative responses should be considered. Finally, raising awareness about the environmental impact of short-lived products via a label may have a positive effect but requires more research attention. |
| https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/jiec.13372 |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
16679
|
Gnanapragasam, A; Cooper, T; Cole, C; Oguchi, M Consumer perspectives on product lifetimes: a national study of lifetime satisfaction and purchasing factors(2017) | |
| 20556
|
Gnanapragasam, A; Oguchi, M; Cole, C; Cooper, T Consumer expectations of product lifetimes around the world: review of global research findings and methods(2017) | |
| 75986
|
Rivera, JL; Lallmahomed, A Environmental implications of planned obsolescence and product lifetime: a literature review(2016)International Journal Of Sustainable Engineering, 9, 2 | |
| 8086
|
Gnanapragasam, A; Cole, C; Singh, J; Cooper, T Consumer perspectives on longevity and reliability: a national study of purchasing factors across eighteen product categories(2018) | |
| 29183
|
Oguchi, M; Tasaki, T; Daigo, I; Cooper, T; Cole, C; Gnanapragasam, A Consumers' expectations for product lifetimes of consumer durables(2016) | |
| 2596
|
Cooper, T WHICH WAY TO TURN? Product longevity and business dilemmas in the circular economy(2017) | |
| 26104
|
Yamamoto, H; Murakami, S Which consumer psychological factors influence the lifetime of consumer electronic products? A case study of personal computers in Japan(2022) | |
| 18057
|
Guillard, V; Le Nagard, E; Ribeiro, GD A typology of consumers regarding perceived obsolescence: The paradox of eco-conscious consumers(2023) | |
| 7495
|
Berg, LL; Hebrok, M Holding on or letting go: Conflicting narratives of product longevity(2024) | |
| 6379
|
Jensen, PB; Laursen, LN; Haase, LM; Klemes, JJ Barriers to product longevity: A review of business, product development and user perspectives(2021) |