| Title | More than peanuts: Transformation towards a circular economy through a small-wins governance framework |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 28082 |
| Authors | Termeer, CJAM; Metze, TAP |
| Title | More than peanuts: Transformation towards a circular economy through a small-wins governance framework |
| Year | 2019 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | Governments across the world aim to accelerate the transition to a circular economy. A pressing question is to what extent and how they can influence transformative change, especially since a circular economy also inherently conflicts with norms underlying existing policies and regulations. Existing circular economy governance literature provide lists of barriers and develop targeted interventions without analyzing underlying mechanisms. This paper bridges this gap by presenting a coherent conceptual framework of continuous transformative change through accumulating small wins. Examples from Dutch Circular Economy Transition Program illustrate the arguments. Small wins are characterized by concrete results in terms of in-depth changes of moderate importance. In the long run, these small wins can amplify and accumulate into transformative change through non-linear mechanisms such as energizing, learning by doing, the logic of attraction, the bandwagon effect, coupling, and robustness. The related governance framework consists of three groups of interventions: 1) setting a provocative ambition; 2) identifying and appreciating small wins; 3) activating mechanisms through which smalls wins can accumulate in transformative change. The small-wins perspective embraces ambiguity, cherishes emerging change, replaces linear governance models by circular systems thinking, and provides insights about how small wins accumulate. First observations indicate that, although the small-wins perspective intuitively makes sense to governance actors, it clashes with the rather unrealistic expectations about governing transitions in rapid, radical, and top-down/linear ways. Hence, governing the acceleration of a linear to a circular economy, requires the transformation of the linearly organized governance system itself. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
3712
|
Cramer, JM Implementing the circular economy in the Amsterdam Metropolitan Area: The interplay between market actors mediated by transition brokers(2020)Business Strategy And The Environment, 29, 6 | |
| 28095
|
Cramer, JM The Function of Transition Brokers in the Regional Governance of Implementing Circular Economy-A Comparative Case Study of Six Dutch Regions(2020)Sustainability, 12.0, 12 | |
| 884
|
de Jesus, A; Antunes, P; Santos, R; Mendonça, S Eco-innovation pathways to a circular economy: Envisioning priorities through a Delphi approach(2019) | |
| 21889
|
Henry, M; Kirchherr, J; Raven, R; Hekkert, M Bottom-up dynamics in circular innovation systems: The perspective of circular start-ups(2024)Journal Of Industrial Ecology, 28.0, 2 | |
| 361
|
Pansera, M; Genovese, A; Ripa, M Politicising Circular Economy: what can we learn from Responsible Innovation?(2021)Journal Of Responsible Innovation, 8, 3 | |
| 23215
|
Bauwens, T; Hekkert, M; Kirchherr, J Circular futures: What Will They Look Like?(2020) | |
| 16157
|
Cramer, J E ffective governance of circular economies: An international comparison(2022) | |
| 2250
|
Steenmans, K; Lesniewska, F Limitations of the circular economy concept in law and policy(2023) | |
| 3261
|
Iacovidou, E; Hahladakis, JN; Purnell, P A systems thinking approach to understanding the challenges of achieving the circular economy(2021)Environmental Science And Pollution Research, 28, 19 | |
| 656
|
Hartley, K; Schülzchen, S; Bakker, CA; Kirchherr, J A policy framework for the circular economy: Lessons from the EU(2023) |