| Title | A Methodological Framework for the Selection of Key Performance Indicators to Assess Smart City Solutions |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 38571 |
| Authors | Angelakoglou, K; Nikolopoulos, N; Giourka, P; Svensson, IL; Tsarchopoulos, P; Tryferidis, A; Tzovaras, D |
| Title | A Methodological Framework for the Selection of Key Performance Indicators to Assess Smart City Solutions |
| Year | 2019 |
| Published | Smart Cities, 2, 2 |
| Abstract | Smart and sustainable cities are expected to form a cornerstone for achieving resource efficiency and sustainability worldwide. In this specific study we introduce a holistic framework for determining a repository of key performance indicators (KPIs) that are able to evaluate both business-as-usual and novel technologies and services related to smart city solutions. The framework includes six steps: (a) Clustering of the technology/service solutions into groups called Transition Tracks; (b) definition of the main groups of stakeholders; (c) definition of KPIs dimensions (or domains); (d) definition of KPIs repository per dimension; (e) definition of the scope of evaluation per KPI; and (f) threshold definition per KPI. The implementation of the proposed framework led to the development of a repository of 75 KPIs categorized in six dimensions (technical, environmental, economic, social, ICT and legal KPIs) with the corresponding levels of assessment and stakeholders' group of interest. The proposed repository can serve as a great basis for similar projects to monitor and evaluate the performance of their solutions. Tips and guidance based on the actual implementation and lessons learned from a smart city project are provided. |
| https://www.mdpi.com/2624-6511/2/2/18/pdf?version=1561200875 |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
43004
|
Angelakoglou, K; Kourtzanidis, K; Giourka, P; Apostolopoulos, V; Nikolopoulos, N; Kantorovitch, J From a Comprehensive Pool to a Project-Specific List of Key Performance Indicators for Monitoring the Positive Energy Transition of Smart Cities-An Experience-Based Approach(2020)Smart Cities, 3, 3 | |
| 39561
|
Kourtzanidis, K; Angelakoglou, K; Apostolopoulos, V; Giourka, P; Nikolopoulos, N Assessing Impact, Performance and Sustainability Potential of Smart City Projects: Towards a Case Agnostic Evaluation Framework(2021)Sustainability, 13, 13 | |
| 39096
|
Ahvenniemi, H; Huovila, A; Pinto-Seppä, I; Airaksinen, M What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities?(2017) | |
| 79085
|
De Sanctis, M; Iovino, L; Rossi, MT; Wimmer, M A Flexible Architecture for Key Performance Indicators Assessment in Smart Cities(2020) | |
| 36753
|
Patrao, C; Moura, P; de Almeida, AT Review of Smart City Assessment Tools(2020)Smart Cities, 3, 4 | |
| 36077
|
Sharifi, A; Allam, Z On the taxonomy of smart city indicators and their alignment with sustainability and resilience(2022)Environment And Planning B-Urban Analytics And City Science, 49, 5 | |
| 44962
|
Ependi, U; Rochim, AF; Wibowo, A Smart City Assessment for Sustainable City Development on Smart Governance: A Systematic Literature Review(2022) | |
| 36472
|
Benites, AJ; Simoes, AF Assessing the urban sustainable development strategy: An application of a smart city services sustainability taxonomy(2021) | |
| 43725
|
Abu-Rayash, A; Dincer, I Development of integrated sustainability performance indicators for better management of smart cities(2021) | |
| 45538
|
Airaksinen, M; Seppä, IP; Huovila, A; Bosch, P; Neumann, HM; Iglar, B Smart City performance measurement framework CITYkeys(2017) |