| Title | Ex Ante Governance in the European Union: Energy and climate policy as a ?test run? for the post-pandemic recovery |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 61923 |
| Authors | Misík, M; Oravcová, V |
| Title | Ex Ante Governance in the European Union: Energy and climate policy as a ?test run? for the post-pandemic recovery |
| Year | 2022 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | This paper asks what policy tools the European Commission used to push member states to align their national post-pandemic recovery preferences with its own preferences for the green (and digital) recovery. It claims that the Commission did not create new policy tool in response to the crisis, but utilised an existing one, previously successfully tested in climate and energy policy. This tool, ex ante governance, developed under the 2018 Governance Regulation, enabled the Commission to influence member states' national goals (defined in their National Energy and Climate Plans) before they were formally adopted. The Commission's main aim was to link the national targets with the 2030 climate and energy goals binding at the EU level. Ex ante governance helped the Commission achieve this linkage as it pushed member countries to commit to more ambitious national targets than they had originally intended. This enabled the EU27 to reach a commitment level that will support the 2030 climate and energy goals set at the EU level. This modus operandi contrasts with the previous ex post assessment process that was ineffective; the original rules on the Intergovernmental Agreements have revealed the limitations of this approach. Due to its success the Commission applied the ex ante governance model to the post pandemic recovery, where it wanted to align member states' national preferences (presented in the National Recovery and Resilience Plans) with its green (and other) recovery objectives. Such a development indicates the emergence of a complex ex ante governance within the EU. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
63325
|
Crncec, D; Penca, J; Lovec, M The COVID-19 pandemic and the EU: From a sustainable energy transition to a green transition?(2023) | |
| 63247
|
Dupont, C; Moore, B; Boasson, EL; Gravey, V; Jordan, A; Kivimaa, P; Kulovesi, K; Kuzemko, C; Oberthür, S; Panchuk, D; Rosamond, J; Torney, D; Tosun, J; von Homeyer, I Three decades of EU climate policy: Racing toward climate neutrality?(2024)Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Climate Change, 15, 1 | |
| 62974
|
Rosamond, J The slow-burning climate emergency and the European Green Deal: Prospects and pitfalls in the polycrisis era(2023) | |
| 63787
|
Lupiola, AG New strategies of the European Union to tackle the double challenge of the climate crisis and energy dependence(2023) | |
| 63052
|
Skjærseth, JB Towards a European Green Deal: The evolution of EU climate and energy policy mixes(2021)International Environmental Agreements-Politics Law And Economics, 21, 1 | |
| 62953
|
Oberthür, S; von Homeyer, I From emissions trading to the European Green Deal: the evolution of the climate policy mix and climate policy integration in the EU(2023)Journal Of European Public Policy, 30, 3 | |
| 63881
|
Schwarte, C EU Climate Policy under the Paris Agreement(2021)Climate Law, 11, 2 | |
| 62904
|
Rosamond, J; Dupont, C The European Council, the Council, and the European Green Deal(2021)Politics And Governance, 9, 3 | |
| 62872
|
Carevic, M The Covid-19 Pandemic And The Implementation Of The European Green Deal(2021) | |
| 63857
|
de las Heras, BP The 'Fit for 55' Package: Towards a More Integrated Climate Framework in the EU(2022)Romanian Journal Of European Affairs, 22, 2 |