| Title | Can the digital economy address the loss of green development efficiency due to resource mismatch? Evidence from China's land transaction markets |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 62753 |
| Authors | Wang, JL; Wu, HT; Xiao, DH; Luo, XX; Liu, Y; Wang, WL |
| Title | Can the digital economy address the loss of green development efficiency due to resource mismatch? Evidence from China's land transaction markets |
| Year | 2023 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | Land is the driving force of economic growth, but the proliferation of industrial land has resulted in wasted land resources, impaired economic efficiency, and ecological damage in China. Currently, the digital economy is transforming China's economic growth model. Exploring the corrective mechanisms of the digital economy for land resource mismatch can contribute to efficient economic growth. Using a sample of Chinese prefecture-level cities from 2007-2019, we employ a spatial Durbin model to explore the impact of land resource mismatch on green development efficiency (GDE) in the context of the digital economy, which is critical to rational planning, utilization, and regulation of land resources. The findings show that (1) land resource mismatch inhibits GDE, and the crowding-out, structural inhibition, and agglomeration economy dilution effect are primary influencing mechanisms. (2) A local land resource mismatch harms GDE in neighboring areas. (3) The digital economy has a positive moderating effect on land resource mismatch and GDE. (4) Land resource mismatch reduces GDE in the eastern and central regions; the moderating effect of the digital economy exists only in the eastern region. Finally, this study proposes comprehensive and complete countermeasures to correct the land resource mismatch and its influence channels and enhance the construction of the digital economy. The conclusions of this study provide specific theoretical contributions to promote the spatial allocation efficiency of land resources, promote green and efficient economic development, and stimulate and release the dividends of the digital economy. |
| https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Can_the_digital_economy_address_the_loss_of_green_development_efficiency_due_to_resource_mismatch_Evidence_from_China_s_land_transaction_markets/24167120 |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
62339
|
Wen, R; Li, HY Impact of digital economy on urban land green use efficiency: evidence from Chinese cities(2024)Environmental Research Communications, 6, 5 | |
| 62463
|
Ai, KP; Li, HH; Zhang, WJ; Yan, XW Digital Economy and Green and Low-Carbon Transformation of Land Use: Spatial Effects and Moderating Mechanisms(2024)Land, 13, 8 | |
| 62277
|
Xie, ZM; Ma, JJ; Huang, SM; Zhu, JJ Digital economy and inclusive green growth: The moderating effect of government environmental regulation(2023)Environmental Science And Pollution Research, 30, 49 | |
| 62389
|
Kong, LZ; Li, JY Digital Economy Development and Green Economic Efficiency: Evidence from Province-Level Empirical Data in China(2023)Sustainability, 15, 1 | |
| 31488
|
Ren, YJ; Tian, Z; Liu, C Impact of the digital economy on urban green growth: Empirical evidence from China(2023)Plos One, 18, 12 | |
| 62313
|
Ji, ZJ; Zhao, L; Song, XY; Gao, XT Digital economy impact on inclusive green growth: intermediary and spatial spillover effects in China(2023)Environmental Science And Pollution Research, 30, 59 | |
| 62399
|
Yu, HY; Wang, JC; Xu, JJ; Ding, BH Does digital economy agglomeration promote green economy efficiency? A spatial spillover and spatial heterogeneity perspective(2024) | |
| 62750
|
Tang, Y; Chen, MH The Impact Mechanism and Spillover Effect of Digital Rural Construction on the Efficiency of Green Transformation for Cultivated Land Use in China(2022)International Journal Of Environmental Research And Public Health, 19, 23 | |
| 62116
|
Xiao, Y; Wu, S; Liu, ZQ; Lin, HJ Digital economy and green development: Empirical evidence from China's cities(2023) | |
| 62646
|
Chen, K; Guo, F; Xu, S The Impact of Digital Economy Agglomeration on Regional Green Total Factor Productivity Disparity: Evidence from 285 Cities in China(2022)Sustainability, 14, 22 |