Knowledge Agora



Similar Articles

Title CO2 sequestration in Poland does not make sense?!
ID_Doc 63845
Authors Such, P
Title CO2 sequestration in Poland does not make sense?!
Year 2020
Published
Abstract The main goal of European Green Deal is for all EU member states to become climate-neutral by 2050. One option is CO2 sequestration. It means underground CO2 storage in geological structures. Theoretically, such sequestration could lower CO2 emissions by about 20%. This process has also, however, a number of disadvantages, such as high costs and restricted volume of appropriate geological objects. Sequestration processes can be divided into three groups: sequestration in depleted hydrocarbon deposits, sequestration in aquifers and sequestration coupled with EOR and geothermal energy capture. To sequestrate a significant part of emitted CO2, it is necessary to separate CO2 in power plants, to adapt appropriate geological objects, to investigate such objects and to build infrastructure and pipelines. What elements affect the cost of sequestration? First of all, separation of CO2 requiring large amount of energy (about 10% of energy produced in power plant). Next, gas must be compressed and rendered to supercritical/liquid phase. In the case of depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs, we know that the structure is tight and there is an infrastructure on the surface. When it comes to aquifers, it is necessary to carry out a full set of investigations, drill holes and build an infrastructure. If Poland wants to fulfill all tasks of Green Deal, huge investments are needed. The cost analysis should take into account such elements as the length of pipelines to be constructed and existing power grids. Any probable sequestration must be correlated with hydrogen projects. RES cannot work alone because they are not able to provide a constant supply of energy. It can be achieved with energy mix. Such a mix should be based on nuclear plants built in place of the greatest coal plants, which will make it possible to use the existing power grids. RES coupled with hydrogen economy should result in the second largest contribution to energy mix. All coal power plants must be modernized. Hybridization must be taken into account here (biomass or steam and gas power plants). This should reduce their emissions by about 30-40%. The share of sequestration will be very small and associated with geothermal energy.
PDF

Similar Articles

ID Score Article
63238 Lapcik, V; Lapcik, M Current Aspects of Decarbonisation in the Czech Republic and Possibilities of Replacement of Coal Energy Sources by Renewable Sources of Electric Energy(2022)
14367 Ciechanowska, M European Green Deal - a challenge for the transformation of the Polish oil and gas industry(2020)
63735 Fajdetic, B; Festic, M The Role Of Solar Energy In Decarbonization - Evidence Of The European Union(2022)
63012 Iglinski, B; Pietrzak, MB; Kielkowska, U; Skrzatek, M; Gajdos, A; Zyadin, A; Natarajan, K How to Meet the Green Deal Objectives-Is It Possible to Obtain 100% RES at the Regional Level in the EU?(2022)Energies, 15, 6
64337 Khorishko, L Poland'S Energy Security In The Context Of Eu Environmental Initiatives(2021)Baltic Journal Of Economic Studies, 7, 4
62858 Recka, L; Máca, V; Scasny, M Green Deal and Carbon Neutrality Assessment of Czechia(2023)Energies, 16, 5
65085 Nagovnak, P; Schuetzenhofer, C; Mobarakeh, MR; Cvetkovska, R; Stortecky, S; Hainoun, A; Alton, V; Kienberger, T Assessment of technology-based options for climate neutrality in Austrian manufacturing industry(2024)Heliyon, 10.0, 3
63718 Rajchel, D; Rajchel, A The Implementation Of The "Clear Air" Programme In Poland Including Voivodeships(2024)Ekonomia I Srodowisko-Economics And Environment, 88, 1
62867 Guzialowska-Tic, J; Tic, WJ European Green Deal - opportunities and threats resulting from it for Poland(2024)Przemysl Chemiczny, 103, 1
62868 Guzialowska-Tic, J; Tic, WJ European Green Deal - opportunities and threats resulting from it for Poland(2024)Przemysl Chemiczny, 103, 1
Scroll