| Title | Bridging Tools to Better Understand Environmental Performances and Raw Materials Supply of Traction Batteries in the Future EU Fleet |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 8995 |
| Authors | Bobba, S; Bianco, I; Eynard, U; Carrara, S; Mathieux, F; Blengini, GA |
| Title | Bridging Tools to Better Understand Environmental Performances and Raw Materials Supply of Traction Batteries in the Future EU Fleet |
| Year | 2020 |
| Published | Energies, 13.0, 10 |
| Abstract | Sustainable and smart mobility and associated energy systems are key to decarbonise the EU and develop a clean, resource efficient, circular and carbon-neutral future. To achieve the 2030 and 2050 targets, technological and societal changes are needed. This transition will inevitably change the composition of the future EU fleet, with an increasing share of electric vehicles (xEVs). To assess the potential contribution of lithium-ion traction batteries (LIBs) in decreasing the environmental burdens of EU mobility, several aspects should be included. Even though environmental assessments of batteries along their life-cycle have been already conducted using life-cycle assessment, a single tool does not likely provide a complete overview of such a complex system. Complementary information is provided by material flow analysis and criticality assessment, with emphasis on supply risk. Bridging complementary aspects can better support decision-making, especially when different strategies are simultaneously tackled. The results point out that the future life-cycle GWP of traction LIBs will likely improve, mainly due to more environmental-friendly energy mix and improved recycling. Even though second-use will postpone available materials for recycling, both these end-of-life strategies allow keeping the values of materials in the circular economy, with recycling also contributing to mitigate the supply risk of Lithium and Nickel. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
21199
|
Etxandi-Santolaya, M; Casals, LC; Montes, T; Corchero, C Are electric vehicle batteries being underused? A review of current practices and sources of circularity(2023) | |
| 22566
|
Prates, L; Karthe, D; Zhang, LL; Wang, LL; O'Connor, J; Lee, H; Dornack, C Sustainability for all? The challenges of predicting and managing the potential risks of end-of-life electric vehicles and their batteries in the Global South(2023)Environmental Earth Sciences, 82.0, 6 | |
| 26991
|
Bruno, M; Fiore, S Material Flow Analysis of Lithium-Ion Battery Recycling in Europe: Environmental and Economic Implications(2023)Batteries-Basel, 9, 4 | |
| 25048
|
Wewer, A; Bilge, P; Dietrich, F Advances of 2nd Life Applications for Lithium Ion Batteries from Electric Vehicles Based on Energy Demand(2021)Sustainability, 13, 10 | |
| 16420
|
Akram, MN; Abdul-Kader, W Sustainable Development Goals and End-of-Life Electric Vehicle Battery: Literature Review(2023)Batteries-Basel, 9, 7 | |
| 64582
|
Paul, D; Pechancová, V; Saha, N; Pavelková, D; Saha, N; Motiei, M; Jamatia, T; Chaudhuri, M; Ivanichenko, A; Venher, M; Hrbácková, L; Sáha, P Life cycle assessment of lithium-based batteries: Review of sustainability dimensions(2024) | |
| 64647
|
Oliveri, LM; D'Urso, D; Trapani, N; Chiacchio, F Electrifying Green Logistics: A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Electric and Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles(2023)Energies, 16, 23 | |
| 29440
|
Kastanaki, E; Giannis, A Dynamic estimation of end-of-life electric vehicle batteries in the EU-27 considering reuse, remanufacturing and recycling options(2023) | |
| 20529
|
Watari, T; Nansai, K; Nakajima, K; McLellan, BC; Dominish, E; Giurco, D Integrating Circular Economy Strategies with Low-Carbon Scenarios: Lithium Use in Electric Vehicles(2019)Environmental Science & Technology, 53, 20 | |
| 22681
|
Rajaeifar, MA; Ghadimi, P; Raugei, M; Wu, YF; Heidrich, O Challenges and recent developments in supply and value chains of electric vehicle batteries: A sustainability perspective(2022) |