| Title |
Stakeholder prioritizations for electric vehicle charging across time periods |
| ID_Doc |
77298 |
| Authors |
van der Koogh, M; Chappin, E; Heller, R; Lukszo, Z |
| Title |
Stakeholder prioritizations for electric vehicle charging across time periods |
| Year |
2023 |
| Published |
|
| DOI |
10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.09.003 |
| Abstract |
Electric vehicles have penetrated the Dutch market, which increases the potential for decreased local emissions, the use and storage of sustainable energy, and the roll-out and use of electric car-sharing business models. This development also raises new potential issues such as increased electricity demand, a lack of social acceptance, and infrastructural challenges in the built environment. Relevant stakeholders, such as policymakers and service providers, need to align their values and prioritize these aspects. Our study investigates the prioritization of 11 Dutch decision-makers in the field of public electric vehicle charging. These decision-makers prioritized different indicators related to measurements (e.g., EV adoption rates or charge point profitability), organization (such as fast- or smart-charging), and developments (e.g., the development of mobility-service markets) using the bestworst method. The indicators within these categories were prioritized for three different scenario's in time. The results reveal that priorities will shift from EV adoption and roll-out of infrastructure to managing peak demand, using more sustainable charging techniques (such as V2G), and using sustainable energy towards 2030. Technological advancements and autonomous charging techniques will become more relevant in a later time period, around 2040. Environmental indicators (e.g., local emissions) were consistently valued low, whereas mobility indicators were valued differently across participants, indicating a lack of consensus. Smart charging was consistently valued higher than other charging techniques, independent of time period. The results also revealed that there are some distinct differences between the priorities of policymakers and service providers. Having a systematic overview of what aspects matter supports the policy discussion around EVs in the built environment. |
| Author Keywords |
Stakeholder analysis; Electric vehicle charging; e-mobility; Energy transition |
| Index Keywords |
Index Keywords |
| Document Type |
Other |
| Open Access |
Open Access |
| Source |
Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) |
| EID |
WOS:001075280700001 |
| WoS Category |
Economics; Transportation |
| Research Area |
Business & Economics; Transportation |
| PDF |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.09.003
|