| Title | BIM-Based End-of-Lifecycle Decision Making and Digital Deconstruction: Literature Review |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 19473 |
| Authors | Akbarieh, A; Jayasinghe, LB; Waldmann, D; Teferle, FN |
| Title | BIM-Based End-of-Lifecycle Decision Making and Digital Deconstruction: Literature Review |
| Year | 2020 |
| Published | Sustainability, 12.0, 7 |
| Abstract | This article is the second part of a two-part study, which explored the extent to which Building Information Modelling (BIM) is used for End-of-Lifecycle (EoL) scenario selection to minimise the Construction and Demolition Waste (CDW). The conventional literature review presented here is based on the conceptual landscape that was obtained from the bibliometric and scientometric analysis in the first part of the study. Seven main academic research directions concerning the BIM-based EoL domain were found, including social and cultural factors, BIM-based Design for Deconstruction (DfD), BIM-based deconstruction, BIM-based EoL within LCA, BIM-aided waste management, Material and Component Banks (M/C Banks), off-site construction, interoperability and Industry Foundation Classes (IFC). The analysis highlights research gaps in the path of raw materials to reusable materials, i.e., from the deconstruction to M/C banks to DfD-based designs and then again to deconstruction. BIM-based EoL is suffering from a lack of a global framework. The existing solutions are based on local waste management policies and case-specific sustainability criteria selection. Another drawback of these ad hoc but well-developed BIM-based EoL prototypes is their use of specific proprietary BIM tools to support their framework. This disconnection between BIM tools and EoL tools is reportedly hindering the BIM-based EoL, while no IFC classes support the EoL phase information exchange. |
| https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/7/2670/pdf?version=1585626079 |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
16453
|
de Neyra, PLA; Celoza, A Deconstruction Information Model-Based Material Passports for Promoting Circular Economy in the AEC Industry through the Use of Building Information Modeling: A Literature Review(2024) | |
| 17376
|
Naghibalsadati, F; Gitifar, A; Ray, S; Richter, A; Ng, KTW Temporal evolution and thematic shifts in sustainable construction and demolition waste management through building information modeling technologies: A text-mining analysis(2024) | |
| 3090
|
de Lima, PRB; Rodrigues, CD; Post, JM Integration of BIM and design for deconstruction to improve circular economy of buildings(2023) | |
| 18885
|
Llatas, C; Quiñones, R; Bizcocho, N Environmental Impact Assessment of Construction Waste Recycling versus Disposal Scenarios Using an LCA-BIM Tool during the Design Stage(2022)Recycling, 7.0, 6 | |
| 19307
|
Han, DC; Kalantari, M; Rajabifard, A Building Information Modeling (BIM) for Construction and Demolition Waste Management in Australia: A Research Agenda(2021)Sustainability, 13.0, 23 | |
| 3151
|
Akanbi, LA; Oyedele, LO; Omoteso, K; Bilal, M; Akinade, OO; Ajayi, AO; Delgado, JMD; Owolabi, HA Disassembly and deconstruction analytics system (D-DAS) for construction in a circular economy(2019) | |
| 19518
|
Allam, AS; Nik-Bakht, M From demolition to deconstruction of the built environment: A synthesis of the literature(2023) | |
| 17127
|
Kuzminykh, A; Granja, J; Parente, M; Azenha, M Promoting circularity of construction materials through demolition digitalisation at the preparation stage: Information requirements and openBIM-based technological implementation(2024) | |
| 6770
|
Honic, M; Kovacic, I; Aschenbrenner, P; Ragossnig, A Material Passports for the end-of-life stage of buildings: Challenges and potentials(2021) | |
| 23027
|
Munaro, MR; Tavares, SF Design for adaptability and disassembly: guidelines for building deconstruction(2023) |